Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310947›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Diabetes treatment for persons with severe mental illness: A registry-based cohort study to explore medication treatment differences for persons with type 2 diabetes with and without severe mental illness.

Catrine Bakkedal, Frederik Persson, Margit Kriegbaum, John Sahl Andersen, Mia Klinten Grant, Grimur Høgnason Mohr, Bent Struer Lind, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Mikkel Bring Christensen, Volkert Siersma and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catrine BakkedalThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-4425
Frederik PerssonComplications Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Margit KriegbaumThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John Sahl AndersenThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mia Klinten GrantThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Grimur Høgnason MohrCentre for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent Struer LindDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Christen Lykkegaard AndersenThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel Bring ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Volkert SiersmaThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maarten Pieter RozingThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been argued that persons with severe mental illness (SMI) receive poorer treatment for somatic comorbidities. This study assesses the treatment rates of glucose-lowering and cardiovascular medications among persons with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and SMI compared to persons with T2D without SMI. We identified persons ≥30 years old with incident diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol and/or glucose ≥ 11.0 mmol/L) from 2001 through 2015 in the Copenhagen Primary Care Laboratory (CopLab) Database. The SMI group included persons with psychotic, affective, or personality disorders within five years preceding the T2D diagnosis. Using a Poisson regression model, we calculated the adjusted rate ratios (aRR) for the redemption of various glucose-lowering and cardiovascular medications up to ten years after T2D diagnosis. We identified 1,316 persons with T2D and SMI and 41,538 persons with T2D but no SMI. Despite similar glycemic control at diagnosis, persons with SMI redeemed a glucose-lowering medication more often than persons without SMI in the period 0.5-2 years after the T2D diagnosis; for example, the aRR was 1.05 (95% CI 1.00-1.11) in the period 1.5-2 years after the T2D diagnosis. This difference was mainly driven by metformin. In contrast, persons with SMI were less often treated with cardiovascular medications during the first 3 years after T2D diagnosis, e.g., in the period 1.5-2 years after T2D diagnosis, the aRR was 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99). For people with SMI in addition to T2D, metformin is more likely to be used in the initial years after T2D diagnosis, while our results suggest potential room for improvement regarding the use of cardiovascular medications.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mental DisordersMetforminAdultCohort StudiesGlucoseHumansRegistriesCardiovascular AgentsGlucoseMetformin

Identifiers

PMID37310947
PMCPMC10263345
OpenAlexW4380537164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.