Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310934›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Lepidopteran Synteny Units reveal deep chromosomal conservation in butterflies and moths.

Walther Traut, Ken Sahara, Richard H Ffrench-Constant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Walther TrautInstitut für Biologie, Zentrum für Medizinische Struktur- und Zellbiologie, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Ken SaharaLaboratory of Molecular Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, 3-18-8, Ueda, Morioka 020-8550, Japan.
Richard H Ffrench-ConstantCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, UK.
Iwate University · JPUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA is compacted into individual particles or chromosomes that form the basic units of inheritance. However, different animals and plants have widely different numbers of chromosomes. This means that we cannot readily tell which chromosomes are related to which. Here, we describe a simple technique that looks at the similarity of genes on each chromosome and thus gives us a true picture of their homology or similarity through evolutionary time. We use this new system to look at the chromosomes of butterflies and moths or Lepidoptera. We term the associated synteny units, Lepidopteran Synteny Units (LSUs). Using a sample of butterfly and moth genomes from across evolutionary time, we show that LSUs form a simple and reliable method of tracing chromosomal homology back through time. Surprisingly, this technique reveals that butterfly and moth chromosomes show conserved blocks dating back to their sister group the Trichoptera. As Lepidoptera have holocentric chromosomes, it will be interesting to see if similar levels of synteny are shown in groups of animals with monocentric chromosomes. The ability to define homology via LSU analysis makes it considerably easier to approach many questions in chromosomal evolution.

Indexed as

ButterfliesMothsAnimalsChromosomesEvolution, MolecularGenomeSyntenyBUSCOchromosome evolutionchromosome numberschromosome rearrangementLepidopteramacrosynteny

Identifiers

PMID37310934
PMCPMC10411566
OpenAlexW4380576221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.