Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310674›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2023

Optimizing Survey Response Rates in Graduate Medical Education Research Studies.

Annie Ericson, Kathryn Bonuck, Larry A Green, Colleen Conry, James C Martin, Patricia A Carney

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Through deaf eyes: factors influencing suicidal behavior among deaf adults.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Thyroid dose guidance in elective supraclavicular breast radiotherapy: a national survey of practice patterns in Switzerland.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of noise exposure and acoustic discomfort in a university dental hygiene clinic.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Methods and lessons from conducting a national study of primary care nurse practitioners.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Pediatric- and Adolescent-Focused Medication Abortion Curriculum for Multidisciplinary Trainees.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annie EricsonOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Kathryn BonuckOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Larry A GreenUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO.
Colleen ConryUniversity of Colorado, Denver, CO.
James C MartinLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Patricia A CarneyOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSurvey response rates of 70% or higher are needed if findings are to be considered generalizable. Unfortunately, survey studies of health professionals have declining response rates. We have conducted survey research with residents and residency directors for over 13 years. Here we describe the strategies we used to obtain optimal response rates in residency training research collaboratives.

methodsWe administered over 6,000 surveys between 2007 and 2019 to evaluate the Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice and Length of Training Pilot studies, both of which involved redesigning residency training. Survey recipients included program directors, clinic managers, residents, graduates, as well as supervising physicians and clinic staff members. We logged and analyzed survey administration efforts and approaches to optimize strategies.

resultsOverall, we obtained response rates of 100% for program director surveys, 98% for resident surveys, 97% for continuity clinic surveys, 81% for graduates surveys, and 48% for the supervising physician and 43% for the clinic staff. Response rates were highest when the relationships between the evaluation team and survey recipients were closest. Strategies for optimizing response rates included (1) building relationships with all participants whenever possible, (2) sensitivity to survey timing and fatigue, and (3) using creative and persistent follow-up measures to encourage survey completion.

conclusionHigh response rates are achievable, though they require an investment in time, resources, and ingenuity in connecting with study populations. Investigators conducting survey research must consider administrative efforts needed to achieve target response rates, including planning for funds accordingly.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFatigueHealth PersonnelHumans

Identifiers

PMID37310674
PMCPMC10622096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.