Border Health Training for Family Physicians: Is There a Need and Interest?

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe United States-Mexico border has unique health care challenges due to a range of structural factors. Providers must be trained to address these barriers to improve health outcomes. Family medicine as a specialty has developed various training modalities to address needs for specific content training outside of core curriculum. Our study assessed perceived need, interest, content, and duration of specific border health training (BHT) for family medicine residents.

methodsElectronic surveys of potential family medicine trainees, faculty, and community physicians assessed appeal, feasibility, preferred content, and duration of BHT. We compared responses from participants from the border region, border states and the rest of the United States in their opinions about modality, duration, content of training, as well as perceived barriers.

resultsSeventy-four percent of survey participants agreed that primary care on the border is unique; 79% indicated a need for specialized BHT. Most border-region faculty were interested in participating as instructors. Most residents expressed interest in short-term rotation experience, yet most faculty recommended postgraduate fellowship. Respondents selected language training (86%), medical knowledge (82%), care of asylum seekers (74%), ethics of cross-cultural work (72%), and advocacy (72%) as the top-five needed training areas.

conclusionsResults of this study indicate a perceived need and sufficient interest in a range of BHT formats to warrant developing additional experiences. Developing a variety of training experiences can engage a wider audience interested in this topic; that should be done in a way ensuring maximum benefit to border-region communities.