ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023
The importance of on-site genetic counseling for prospective assisted reproductive technology patients.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Opportunities to optimize patient experience in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic and the role of genetic counselors.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the value of having an onsite genetic counseling service integrated into an assisted reproductive technology (ART) center.
methodsSince January 2021, we have offered genetic counseling at our ART center for couples whose medical history suggests risk of transmission of a genetic disorder. The percentage of couples referred for genetic counseling, the distribution of couples according to reasons for consultation, the mode of transmission in cases of Mendelian disorders, and the frequency of mutations for those with identified genetic disorders were determined.
resultsIn an 18-month period, 150 of 1340 couples (11.2%) enrolled for ART treatment were referred to the genetic counseling unit. Two-thirds (99/150, 66.0%) were referred for a known genetic risk, a family history of a genetic disorder or chromosomal abnormality, a serious condition of unknown cause, or consanguinity. The remaining couples had a putative genetic risk (diminished ovarian reserve, high incidence of oocyte immaturity, recurrent abortion, or severe male infertility). Of the 99 with known genetic risk, 62 (62.7%), were approved for ART treatment, 23 (23.2%) were recommended prenatal or preimplantation testing, and 14 (14.1%) were referred for further testing before undergoing ART.
conclusionsOur findings reveal great value in having an on-site genetic counseling unit for referral of ART patients. Such a unit makes the ART process smoother and safer for couples, and it lightens the burden of ART staff by removing responsibilities for which they are neither trained, nor should they have to assume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.