Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310561›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Real-time integration between Microsoft HoloLens 2 and 3D Slicer with demonstration in pedicle screw placement planning.

Alicia Pose-Díez-de-la-Lastra, Tamas Ungi, David Morton, Gabor Fichtinger, Javier Pascau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. SlicerROS2: A research and development module for image-guided robotic interventions.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicia Pose-Díez-de-la-LastraDepartamento de Bioingeniería, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Spain. apose@ing.uc3m.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1802-2884
Tamas UngiLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7M2N8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-0609
David MortonLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7M2N8, Canada.
Gabor FichtingerLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7M2N8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6354-262X
Javier PascauDepartamento de Bioingeniería, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-731X

Funding

European Regional Development Fund AC20/00102Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 801538Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PI18/01625TED 2021-129392B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUp to date, there has been a lack of software infrastructure to connect 3D Slicer to any augmented reality (AR) device. This work describes a novel connection approach using Microsoft HoloLens 2 and OpenIGTLink, with a demonstration in pedicle screw placement planning.

methodsWe developed an AR application in Unity that is wirelessly rendered onto Microsoft HoloLens 2 using Holographic Remoting. Simultaneously, Unity connects to 3D Slicer using the OpenIGTLink communication protocol. Geometrical transform and image messages are transferred between both platforms in real time. Through the AR glasses, a user visualizes a patient's computed tomography overlaid onto virtual 3D models showing anatomical structures. We technically evaluated the system by measuring message transference latency between the platforms. Its functionality was assessed in pedicle screw placement planning. Six volunteers planned pedicle screws' position and orientation with the AR system and on a 2D desktop planner. We compared the placement accuracy of each screw with both methods. Finally, we administered a questionnaire to all participants to assess their experience with the AR system.

resultsThe latency in message exchange is sufficiently low to enable real-time communication between the platforms. The AR method was non-inferior to the 2D desktop planner, with a mean error of 2.1 ± 1.4 mm. Moreover, 98% of the screw placements performed with the AR system were successful, according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. The average questionnaire outcomes were 4.5/5.

conclusionsReal-time communication between Microsoft HoloLens 2 and 3D Slicer is feasible and supports accurate planning for pedicle screw placement.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityImaging, Three-DimensionalPedicle ScrewsSoftwareSpinal FusionSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansMale3D SlicerAugmented realityMicrosoft HoloLens 2OpenIGTLinkPedicle screwSurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID37310561
PMCPMC10589185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.