Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310529›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2023

Performance, immune response, and meat quality in Newcastle-vaccinated quail fed with colored corn in place of yellow maize.

Rabia Göçmen, Gülşah Kanbur, Sinan Sefa Parlat, Elif Özdemir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rabia GöçmenDepartment of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. rabiaacar@selcuk.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9816-7746
Gülşah KanburDepartment of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6254-2257
Sinan Sefa ParlatDepartment of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-7342
Elif ÖzdemirDepartment of Crop Science, Agriculture Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-1739
Selçuk University · TR

Funding

Selçuk University Research Foundation 20401107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work investigated the effects of the usage of colored corn as a replacement for 50% and 100% yellow corn in the diet of Japanese quail. Two hundred and forty-day-old Japanese quails were indiscriminately separated into four experimental groups consisting of six replicates each containing 10 quails. Experimental groups designed: the control group (C) (basal diet-0% colored corn, vaccinated), negative control group (NC) (basal diet-0% colored corn, no vaccine), 50% CC group (basal diet-50% colored corn, vaccinated), and 100% CC group (basal diet-100% colored corn, vaccinated). At the end of the 35-day period, the highest body weight and body weight gain (BWG) were recorded in the 50% CC (P < 0.05). The highest feed intake (FI) was recorded in the 100% CC group, the lowest FI in C (P > 0.05), and the best feed conversion ratio (FCR) in the 50% CC group (P < 0.05). While L* was not affected, a* and b* values were significantly affected by feeding colored corn (P < 0.05). Meat pH, cooking loss (CL), and water holding capacity (WHC) values were significantly affected, and the highest pH and CL values were in the C group and the highest WHC value in NC (P < 0.05). Colored corn had no influence on MDA

Indexed as

QuailZea maysAnimalsCoturnixImmunityMeatWaterWeight GainWaterCooking lossFatteningGrowth performanceMDAMeat pH

Identifiers

PMID37310529
OpenAlexW4380422963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.