Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310466›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2023

Efficacy and safety of EGFR inhibitor gefitinib in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a preliminary report.

Abhishek Krishna, M Sathya, S Mukesh, M S Athiyamaan, Sourjya Banerjee, Johan Sunny, Challapalli Srinivas, Dilson Lobo, Bharat Sai Makkapatti, Vaishak Jawahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhishek KrishnaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India. abhishek.krishna@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-7024
M SathyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, India.
S MukeshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, India.
M S AthiyamaanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Sourjya BanerjeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Johan SunnyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Challapalli SrinivasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Dilson LoboDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Bharat Sai MakkapattiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Vaishak JawaharDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in various cancers. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as a monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients with cervical carcinoma who experienced locoregional recurrence or distant metastases either at presentation or after definitive combined chemoradiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy were enrolled. Gefitinib was administered orally at a dose of 250 mg/d to eligible patients. Treatment with Gefitinib was continued until disease progression, intolerable adverse effects were developed, or consent was withdrawn. Clinical and radiological investigations were used to verify the disease response. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The study enrolled 32 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Thirty patients were available for the analysis. The majority of the patients included in the analysis had FIGO stage IIIB disease at their initial presentation. The median follow-up time was 6 months (3-15 months). Two patients (7%) had a complete clinical response, 7 patients (23%) had a partial response, 5 patients (17%) showed a stable disease and 16 patients had progressive disease (53%). The disease control rate was 47%. The median PFS was noted to be 4.5 months and the 1-year PFS was 20%. None of the individuals experienced toxicity of grade 3 or higher. All toxicities were managed conservatively. The study suggests that gefitinib may be a promising therapeutic option for patients with advanced cervical cancer who have limited treatment alternatives.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDisease ProgressionErbB ReceptorsFemaleGefitinibHumansEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsGefitinibCervical cancerEGFRGefitinibMetastatic

Identifiers

PMID37310466
PMCPMC10264517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.