Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310463›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2023

Tetranectin as a potential novel prognostic biomarker in anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction.

Kristina V Kopeva, Elena V Grakova, Sergey N Shilov, Ekaterina N Berezikova, Elena T Bobyleva, Alexander T Teplyakov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina V KopevaDepartment of Myocardial Pathology, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 111a Kievskaya Str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation. kristin-kop@inbox.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-6438
Elena V GrakovaDepartment of Myocardial Pathology, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 111a Kievskaya Str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation.
Sergey N ShilovDepartment of Pathological Physiology and Clinical Pathophysiology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Ekaterina N BerezikovaDepartment of Pathological Physiology and Clinical Pathophysiology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Elena T BobylevaDepartment of Pathological Physiology and Clinical Pathophysiology, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Alexander T TeplyakovDepartment of Myocardial Pathology, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 111a Kievskaya Str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation.
Novosibirsk State Medical University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the association of serum tetranectin levels with cardiac remodeling parameters and to evaluate its prognostic role in women with anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction (ARCD) and without previous cardiovascular diseases (CVD) during 24-month follow-up period. A total of 362 women with primary diagnosed breast cancer who were planned to be treated with anthracyclines were examined. At 12 months after chemotherapy completion, all women were examined and ARCD was diagnosed in 114 patients. After 24 months of follow-up, all patients with ARCD were divided into 2 groups: group 1 comprised women with the adverse course of ARCD (n = 54), group 2 comprised those without it (n = 60). In group 1, the levels of tetranectin were lower than group 2 by 27.6% (p < 0.001) and the patients without ARCD by 33.7% (p < 0.001). In group 1, the levels of tetranectin decreased (p < 0.001) from 11.8 (7.1; 14.3) to 9.02 (5.3; 14.6) pg/mL at 24 months. Moreover, in group 2 (p = 0.871) and in patients without ARCD (p = 0.716), they did not change. The tetranectin values were the independent predictor (odds ratio 7.08; p < 0.001) and its levels ≤ 15/9 ng/mL (AUC = 0.764; p < 0.001) were identified as the predictors for the adverse course of ARCD. NT-proBNP levels did not show the prognostic role, but the addition of NT-proBNP improved prognostic value of analysis (AUC = 0.954; p = 0.002). The cut-off values of tetranectin were established as predictor for adverse course of ARCD, when NT-proBNP was not. The combined use of tetranectin and NT-proBNP demonstrated higher diagnostic value for prediction of adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesHeart DiseasesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBiomarkersFemaleHumansLectins, C-TypeNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBiomarkersLectins, C-TypeNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentstetranectinAnthracycline-related cardiac dysfunctionBiomarkerFibrosisPrognosisTetranectin

Identifiers

PMID37310463
OpenAlexW4380422017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.