ArticleHeart and vessels2023
Tetranectin as a potential novel prognostic biomarker in anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of Tetranectin in Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- A validated, modifiable proteomic score from the EXSCEL trial predicts cardiovascular events in diabetes.JCI insight · 2026Trial
- Risk of cardiac dysfunction in patients receiving anthracyclines across breast cancer and hematologic malignancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study in Japan.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Tetranectin: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions and Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Tetranectin and Paraoxonase-1 as Markers of Heart Failure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Pharmacological intervention of the HMGB1-pCTS-L axis to ameliorate inflammatory diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Repurposing a Detrimental Antibody Epitope as Targeted Therapeutics for Sepsis and Rheumatoid Arthritis.Research square · 2025Article
- Tetranectin and Paraoxonase 1 in Patients with Varying Stages of Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Repurposing a detrimental antibody epitope as targeted therapeutics for sepsis and rheumatoid arthritis.Military Medical Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the association of serum tetranectin levels with cardiac remodeling parameters and to evaluate its prognostic role in women with anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction (ARCD) and without previous cardiovascular diseases (CVD) during 24-month follow-up period. A total of 362 women with primary diagnosed breast cancer who were planned to be treated with anthracyclines were examined. At 12 months after chemotherapy completion, all women were examined and ARCD was diagnosed in 114 patients. After 24 months of follow-up, all patients with ARCD were divided into 2 groups: group 1 comprised women with the adverse course of ARCD (n = 54), group 2 comprised those without it (n = 60). In group 1, the levels of tetranectin were lower than group 2 by 27.6% (p < 0.001) and the patients without ARCD by 33.7% (p < 0.001). In group 1, the levels of tetranectin decreased (p < 0.001) from 11.8 (7.1; 14.3) to 9.02 (5.3; 14.6) pg/mL at 24 months. Moreover, in group 2 (p = 0.871) and in patients without ARCD (p = 0.716), they did not change. The tetranectin values were the independent predictor (odds ratio 7.08; p < 0.001) and its levels ≤ 15/9 ng/mL (AUC = 0.764; p < 0.001) were identified as the predictors for the adverse course of ARCD. NT-proBNP levels did not show the prognostic role, but the addition of NT-proBNP improved prognostic value of analysis (AUC = 0.954; p = 0.002). The cut-off values of tetranectin were established as predictor for adverse course of ARCD, when NT-proBNP was not. The combined use of tetranectin and NT-proBNP demonstrated higher diagnostic value for prediction of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.