Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310413›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2023

Molecular testing raises thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration diagnostic value.

Dongyan Han, Ding Min, Rongli Xie, Zhengshi Wang, Guohui Xiao, Xiaohong Wang, Lei Dong, Zhiqiang Yin, Jian Fei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. BRAF Detection in FNAC Combined with Semi-QuantitativeDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongyan HanD Han, Department of pathology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ding MinD Min, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Rongli XieR Xie, Department of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital Lu Wan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhengshi WangZ Wang, Thyroid Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Guohui XiaoG Xiao, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohong WangX Wang, Shanghai Rigen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Lei DongL Dong, Department of Pathology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Zhiqiang YinZ Yin, Thyroid Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jian FeiJ Fei, Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTongji University · CNRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) remains indeterminate in 16%-24% of the cases. Molecular testing could improve the diagnostic accuracy of FNAB. This study examined the gene mutation profile of patients with thyroid nodules and analyzed the diagnostic ability of molecular testing for thyroid nodules using a self-developed 18-gene test. Between January 2019 and August 2021, 513 samples (414 FNABs and 99 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens) underwent molecular testing at Ruijin Hospital. Sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated. There were 457 mutations in 428 samples. The rates of BRAF, RAS, TERT promoter, RET/PTC, and NTRK3 fusion mutations were 73.3% (n=335), 9.6% (n=44), 2.8% (n=13), 4.8% (n=22), and 0.4% (n=2), respectively. The diagnostic ability of cytology and molecular testing were evaluated in Bethesda II and V-VI samples. For cytology alone, Sen, Spe, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 100%, 25.0%, 97.4%, 100%, and 97.4%; these numbers were 87.5%, 50.0%, 98.0%, 12.5%, and 86.2% when considering positive mutation, and 87.5%, 75.0%, 99.0%, 17.6%, and 87.1% when considering positive cytology or and positive mutation. In Bethesda III-IV nodules, when relying solely on the presence of pathogenic mutations for diagnosis, Sen, Spe, PPV, NPV, and AC were 76.2%, 66.7%, 94.1%, 26.8%, and 75.0%, respectively. It might be necessary to analyze the molecular mechanisms of disease development at the genetic level to predict patients with malignant nodules more accurately in different risk strata and develop rational treatment strategies and definite management plans.

Identifiers

PMID37310413
PMCPMC10448596
OpenAlexW4380422744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.