Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37309837›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2023

Cancer-directed surgery in patients with metastatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized evidence.

Mary Kathryn Abel, Ellen L Myers, Ellen Minkin, Peggy Tahir, Alex B Haynes, Jason D Wright, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Alexander Melamed

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Kathryn AbelDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0447-5823
Ellen L MyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Hospital, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Ellen MinkinUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Peggy TahirLibrary, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Alex B HaynesDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Jason D WrightDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6390-825X
J Alejandro Rauh-HainDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Alexander MelamedDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USChristiana Hospital · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the impact of primary-site surgery plus systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone on overall survival in common metastatic cancer types.

methodsData sources included Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1, 1995-March 22, 2023). Randomized controlled trials were included that enrolled patients diagnosed with the 10 most common de novo metastatic cancer types in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and randomized patients to resection of the primary site and systemic therapy versus systemic treatment alone. Random-effects models were used to pool associations by cancer type.

resultsEight studies with 1774 patients evaluating the efficacy of surgery in breast, renal, stomach, and colorectal cancer were included. There was no statistically significant reduction in risk of all-cause mortality associated with surgical intervention for metastatic breast (HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.40) or renal cancer (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.20), although results were heterogeneous (I

conclusionsFew randomized trials have evaluated cancer-directed surgery among patients with metastatic solid malignancies.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsHumanscancerchemotherapymetastaticstage IVsurgery

Identifiers

PMID37309837
PMCPMC10358262
OpenAlexW4380422547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.