Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37309714›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2024

Multicentre sleep-stage scoring agreement in the Sleep Revolution project.

Sami Nikkonen, Pranavan Somaskandhan, Henri Korkalainen, Samu Kainulainen, Philip I Terrill, Heidur Gretarsdottir, Sigridur Sigurdardottir, Kristin Anna Olafsdottir, Anna Sigridur Islind, María Óskarsdóttir and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06174558 (Is My Sleep Tracker Tracking my Sleep? Validation of Two Wearable Fitness Sleep Trackers on Sleep Staging and Nocturnal Hypoxemia in Sleep Medicine Patients Referred for Diagnostic Polysomnogram), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06174558 unknown statusnot on this map

Is My Sleep Tracker Tracking my Sleep? Validation of Two Wearable Fitness Sleep Trackers on Sleep Staging and Nocturnal Hypoxemia in Sleep Medicine Patients Referred for Diagnostic Polysomnogram

TypeobservationalSponsorRespiratory SpecialistsRan2024 to 2024Enrolled86ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsSleep Tracking Devices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temporally Continuous Automated Sleep-Wake Classification Using Deep Learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Arousal burden is highest in supine sleeping position and during light sleep.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sleep stage continuity is associated with objective daytime sleepiness in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sami NikkonenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0615-4118
Pranavan SomaskandhanSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Henri KorkalainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4686-6112
Samu KainulainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2798-2115
Philip I TerrillSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Heidur GretarsdottirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, School of Technology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sigridur SigurdardottirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, School of Technology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kristin Anna OlafsdottirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, School of Technology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Anna Sigridur IslindReykjavik University Sleep Institute, School of Technology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
María ÓskarsdóttirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, School of Technology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-5095-5356
Erna Sif ArnardóttirReykjavik University Sleep Institute, School of Technology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-3529
Timo LeppänenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-821X
Reykjavík University · ISQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 965417Hengityssairauksien TutkimussäätiöKuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala 5041794Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala 5041803Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala 5041809Maud Kuistilan MuistosäätiöNational Health and Medical Research Council EU-Horizons Grant 2007001National Health and Medical Research Council Ideas Grant 2001729NordForsk via Business Finland NordSleep project 90458Suomen KulttuurirahastoSuomen Tuberkuloosin Vastustamisyhdistyksen Säätiö
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining sleep stages accurately is an important part of the diagnostic process for numerous sleep disorders. However, as the sleep stage scoring is done manually following visual scoring rules there can be considerable variation in the sleep staging between different scorers. Thus, this study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the inter-rater agreement in sleep staging. A total of 50 polysomnography recordings were manually scored by 10 independent scorers from seven different sleep centres. We used the 10 scorings to calculate a majority score by taking the sleep stage that was the most scored stage for each epoch. The overall agreement for sleep staging was κ = 0.71 and the mean agreement with the majority score was 0.86. The scorers were in perfect agreement in 48% of all scored epochs. The agreement was highest in rapid eye movement sleep (κ = 0.86) and lowest in N1 sleep (κ = 0.41). The agreement with the majority scoring varied between the scorers from 81% to 91%, with large variations between the scorers in sleep stage-specific agreements. Scorers from the same sleep centres had the highest pairwise agreements at κ = 0.79, κ = 0.85, and κ = 0.78, while the lowest pairwise agreement between the scorers was κ = 0.58. We also found a moderate negative correlation between sleep staging agreement and the apnea-hypopnea index, as well as the rate of sleep stage transitions. In conclusion, although the overall agreement was high, several areas of low agreement were also found, mainly between non-rapid eye movement stages.

Indexed as

SleepSleep Apnea SyndromesHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSleep Stagesagreementmulticentrescoringsleepsleep stage

Identifiers

PMID37309714
PMCPMC10909532
OpenAlexW4380422210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.