Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37309500›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2023

Nationwide Survey of the Surgical Complications Associated with Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 2015-2020.

Mitsuru Yagi, Nobuyuki Fujita, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Gen Inoue, Yoshihisa Kotani, Seiji Ohtori, Sumihisa Orita, Yasushi Oshima, Daisuke Sakai, Toshinori Sakai and 12 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 3 countries.

Mitsuru YagiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki FujitaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Tomohiko HasegawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University, School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Gen InoueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Yoshihisa KotaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Japan.
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Sumihisa OritaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yasushi OshimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Spinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Toshinori SakaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
Hiroshi TaneichiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Daisuke TogawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kinki University, Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Japan.
Kazuo NakanishiDepartment of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Spine Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Hiroaki NakashimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshitaka YoshiiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya NakamuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoki IwasakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Hirotaka HaroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan.
Tokumi KanemuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.
Naobumi HosoganeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
New Technology Assessment Committee of The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
Chiba University · JPKeio University · JPTokai University · JPDokkyo Medical University · JPFujita Health University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPInstitute of Biomedical Science · GBKansai Medical University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPKindai University · JPKitasato University · JPKonan Kosei Hospital · JPKyorin University · JPNagoya University · JPOsaka Rosai Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has been introduced in Japan in 2013. Despite the effectiveness of this procedure, several considerable complications have been reported. This study reported the results of a nationwide survey performed by the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR) on the complications associated with LLIF performed in Japan. Methods: JSSR members conducted a web-based survey following LLIF between 2015 and 2020. Any complications meeting the following criteria were included: (1) major vessel, (2) urinary tract, (3) renal, (4) visceral organ, (5) lung, (6) vertebral, (7) nerve, and (8) anterior longitudinal ligament injury; (9) weakness of psoas; (10) motor and (11) sensory deficit; (12) surgical site infection; and (13) other complications. The complications were analyzed in all LLIF patients, and the differences in incidence and type of complications between the transpsoas (TP) and prepsoas (PP) approaches were compared. Results: Among the 13,245 LLIF patients (TP 6,198 patients [47%] and PP 7,047 patients [53%]), 389 complications occurred in 366 (2.76%) patients. The most common complication was sensory deficit (0.5%), followed by motor deficit (0.43%) and weakness of psoas muscle (0.22%). Among the patient cohort, 100 patients (0.74%) required revision surgery during the survey period. Almost half of the complications developed in patients with spinal deformity (183 patients [47.0%]). Four patients (0.03%) died from complications. Statistically more frequent complications occurred in the TP approach than in the PP approach (TP vs. PP, 220 patients [3.55%] vs. 169 patients [2.40%]; p<0.001). Conclusions: The overall complication rate was 2.76%, and 0.74% of the patients required revision surgery because of complications. Four patients died from complications. LLIF may be beneficial for degenerative lumbar conditions with acceptable complications; however, the indication for spinal deformity should be carefully determined by the experience of the surgeon and the extent of the deformity.

Indexed as

complicationsDegenerative spine conditionsLLIFmajor vessel injurynationwide survey

Identifiers

PMID37309500
PMCPMC10257956
OpenAlexW4312304520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.