ArticleMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement2021
Genomic prediction using training population design in interspecific soybean populations.
Article in Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving grain yield prediction in Southern US oat germplasm using genomics information and environmental covariates.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Association mapping and genome prediction reveal a complex genetic architecture for resistance to black and frosty pod rot in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) populations.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- White Lupin Genomic Selection for Adaptation to Drought or Moderately Calcareous Soil: A Proof-of-Concept Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Dissecting the genetic and phenotypic basis of salinity tolerance in mungbean: insights from multi-stage phenotyping, GWAS and genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genomic and phenomic prediction for soybean seed yield, protein, and oil.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Advances in genomic tools for plant breeding: harnessing DNA molecular markers, genomic selection, and genome editing.Biological research · 2024Review
- Ability of Genomic Prediction to Bi-Parent-Derived Breeding Population Using Public Data for Soybean Oil and Protein Content.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Selective Genotyping and Phenotyping for Optimization of Genomic Prediction Models for Populations with Different Diversity.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development of molecular inversion probes for soybean progeny genomic selection genotyping.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Soybean genetic resources contributing to sustainable protein production.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Review
- Genetic and Genomic Resources for Soybean Breeding Research.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Genome-wide association study, haplotype analysis, and genomic prediction reveal the genetic basis of yield-related traits in soybean (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- How Could the Use of Crop Wild Relatives in Breeding Increase the Adaptation of Crops to Marginal Environments?Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Genomic Selection: A Tool for Accelerating the Efficiency of Molecular Breeding for Development of Climate-Resilient Crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agronomically important traits generally have complex genetic architecture, where many genes have a small and largely additive effect. Genomic prediction has been demonstrated to increase genetic gain and efficiency in plant breeding programs beyond marker-assisted selection and phenotypic selection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of allelic origin, marker density, training population size, and cross-validation schemes on the accuracy of genomic prediction models in an interspecific soybean nested association mapping (NAM) panel. Three cross-validation schemes were used: (a) Within-Family (WF): training population and predictions are made exclusively within each family; (b) Across All families (AF): all the individuals from the three families were randomly assigned to either the training or validation set; (c) Leave one Family out (LFO): each family is predicted using a training set that contains the other two families. Predictive abilities increased with training population size up to 350 individuals, but no significant gains were noted beyond 250 individuals in the training population. The number of markers had a limited impact on the observed predictive ability across traits; increasing markers used in the model above 1000 revealed no significant increases in prediction accuracy. Predictive abilities for AF were not significantly different from the WF method, and predictive abilities across populations for the WF method had a range of 0.58 to 0.70 for maturity, protein, meal, and oil. Our results also showed encouraging prediction accuracies for grain yield (0.58-0.69) using the WF method. Partitioning genomic prediction between Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11032-021-01203-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.