ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023
Real-World Experience of Treating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Triple Therapy.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Triple Therapy on the Clinical Course of Non-Eosinophilic COPD Groups B.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Impact of Triple Inhaler Therapy on COPD Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Radical Surgery: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of Single-Inhaler Triple Treatment Through Assorted Respiratory Outcomes When Switched From Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies (RESTART): A Prospective Cohort Study of Korean Patients With COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Observational
- Triple Therapy in Routine Clinical Practice: Beyond Clinical Trials in COPD.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Double-blind randomized controlled trials have compared patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) taking triple therapy, which can improve lung function, dyspnea, and quality of life and reduce acute exacerbation and mortality, with those taking long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist; however, the real-word treatment scenario may be different from that of a strict and well-designed study. The aim of our study was to assess long-term outcomes among patients with COPD who received triple therapy in real-world practice. Methods: Data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2005 and 2016 were used to identify COPD patients who were over 40 years of age with diagnosis codes 490-492, 496 (ICD-9-CM) or J41-44 (ICD-10-CM). After matching for age, sex, and COPD exacerbations, COPD patients who did and did not receive triple therapy were enrolled in this study. Cox proportional regression was used to estimate the mortality risk between smoking status and COPD patients with and without triple therapy. Results: A total of 19,358 patients with COPD who did or did not receive triple therapy were enrolled in this study. The prevalence rates of some comorbidities were higher among patients with COPD who received triple therapy than among those who did not receive triple therapy. These comorbidities included lung cancer, thoracic malignancies, bronchiectasis, and heart failure. The risk of mortality was higher among patients who received triple therapy than among those who did not receive triple therapy after matching for age, sex, and COPD exacerbations, with a crude hazard ratio, fully adjusted model hazard ratio and stepwise approach reduced hazard ratio of 1.568 (95% CI, 1.500-1.639), 1.675 (95% CI, 1.596-1.757), and 1.677 (95% CI, 1.599-1.76), respectively. Conclusion: Over 5 years of observation, patients with COPD who received triple therapy did not show a survival benefit compared with those who did not receive triple therapy in a real-world scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.