Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37309385›Full record

ArticleMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement2021

Single-trait, multi-locus and multi-trait GWAS using four different models for yield traits in bread wheat.

Parveen Malik, Jitendra Kumar, Sahadev Singh, Shiveta Sharma, Prabina Kumar Meher, Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Joy Kumar Roy, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Harindra Singh Balyan, Pushpendra Kumar Gupta and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GWAS for main effects and epistatic interactions for grain morphology traits in wheat.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetics of spot blotch resistance in bread wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Parveen MalikDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Jitendra KumarDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Sahadev SinghDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Shiveta SharmaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Prabina Kumar MeherCentre for Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Mukesh Kumar SharmaDepartment of Mathematics, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Joy Kumar RoyNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (NABI), Sector 81, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, 140306 Punjab India.
Pradeep Kumar SharmaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Harindra Singh BalyanDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Pushpendra Kumar GuptaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.
Shailendra SharmaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0803-5203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) for 10 yield and yield component traits was conducted using an association panel comprising 225 diverse spring wheat genotypes. The panel was genotyped using 10,904 SNPs and evaluated for three years (2016-2019), which constituted three environments (E1, E2 and E3). Heritability for different traits ranged from 29.21 to 97.69%. Marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified for each trait using data from each environment separately and also using BLUP values. Four different models were used, which included three single trait models (CMLM, FarmCPU, SUPER) and one multi-trait model (mvLMM). Hundreds of MTAs were obtained using each model, but after Bonferroni correction, only 6 MTAs for 3 traits were available using CMLM, and 21 MTAs for 4 traits were available using FarmCPU; none of the 525 MTAs obtained using SUPER could qualify after Bonferroni correction. Using BLUP, 20 MTAs were available, five of which also figured among MTAs identified for individual environments. Using mvLMM model, after Bonferroni correction, 38 multi-trait MTAs, for 15 different trait combinations were available. Epistatic interactions involving 28 pairs of MTAs were also available for seven of the 10 traits; no epistatic interactions were available for GNPS, PH, and BYPP. As many as 164 putative candidate genes (CGs) were identified using all the 50 MTAs (CMLM, 3; FarmCPU, 9; mvLMM, 6, epistasis, 21 and BLUP, 11 MTAs), which ranged from 20 (CMLM) to 66 (epistasis) CGs. In-silico expression analysis of CGs was also conducted in different tissues at different developmental stages. The information generated through the present study proved useful for developing a better understanding of the genetics of each of the 10 traits; the study also provided novel markers for marker-assisted selection (MAS) to be utilized for the development of wheat cultivars with improved agronomic traits. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11032-021-01240-1.

Indexed as

Agronomic traitsCandidate genesEpistasisGWASMTATriticum aestivum L.

Identifiers

PMID37309385
PMCPMC10236106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.