Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37309344›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Tularemia in the Differential Diagnosis of Lymphadenitis: A Retrospective Analysis of 16 Cases.

Umut D Binay, Orçun Barkay, Faruk Karakeçili

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical review of tularemia cases, evaluation of treatment approaches: single-center retrospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Umut D BinayDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, TUR.
Orçun BarkayDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, TUR.
Faruk KarakeçiliDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, TUR.
Erzincan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by

methodsIn this study, the clinical and laboratory findings of 16 tularemia patients between 2011 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively.

resultsThe mean age of the 16 patients included in the study was 39 years, and 62.5% were female. The patients were diagnosed with tularemia on the average 31st day of their complaints. The rate of use of beta-lactam group antibiotics before diagnosis was 74%. About 81.25% of the patients were engaged in animal husbandry/farming, and living in rural areas (93.75%) and farming (81.25%) were the most common possible risk factors. The patients were admitted to the hospital with the most common complaints of enlarged lymph nodes (100%), fatigue (62.5%) and loss of appetite (56.25%). All patients had lymphadenopathy, and the most common location of lymphadenopathy was the cervical region (81.25%). Moxifloxacin (56.25%) was used most frequently in the treatment of tularemia, and surgical drainage was performed for 31% of the patients.

conclusionThe diagnosis of tularemia is often delayed unless clinical suspicion is high. Delayed diagnosis may lead to unnecessary frequent use of antibiotics, especially beta-lactam group antibiotics. As the diagnosis is delayed, since lymph node suppuration is common, surgical intervention may be required. This situation can cause extra burden for both patients and the health system. It may be beneficial to organize trainings to increase awareness among physicians and society in order to make the diagnosis early.

Indexed as

differential diagnosislymphadenitistularemiawaterborne diseaseszoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID37309344
PMCPMC10257801
OpenAlexW4380422011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.