Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37309078›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.

Mathieu Bisson, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Shelley Doucet, Vivian R Ramsden, Olivier Dumont-Samson, Dana Howse, Mireille Lambert, Charlotte Schwarz, Alison Luke and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Solving the family medicine crisis: Research, evidence, community engagement.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mathieu BissonDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Maud-Christine ChouinardFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Shelley DoucetDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Vivian R RamsdenDepartment of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Olivier Dumont-SamsonDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Dana HowsePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Mireille LambertDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Charlotte SchwarzDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Alison LukeDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Norma RabbitskinDepartment of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
André GaudreauPatient Partners, QC, NS, NB, NL, Canada.
Jude PorterPatient Partners, QC, NS, NB, NL, Canada.
Donna RubensteinPatient Partners, QC, NS, NB, NL, Canada.
Jennifer TaylorPatient Partners, QC, NS, NB, NL, Canada.
Mike WarrenPatient Partners, QC, NS, NB, NL, Canada.
Catherine HudonDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-9916
Université de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

CIHR 397896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGrowing evidence supports patient engagement (PE) in health implementation research to improve the quality, relevance and uptake of research. However, more guidance is needed to plan and operationalize PE before and throughout the research process. The aim of the study was to develop a logic model illustrating the causal links between context, resources, activities, outcomes and impact of PE in an implementation research programme.

methodsThe Patient Engagement in Health Implementation Research Logic Model (hereafter the Logic Model) was developed using a descriptive qualitative design with a participatory approach, in the context of the PriCARE programme. This programme aims to implement and evaluate case management for individuals who frequently use healthcare services in primary care clinics across five Canadian provinces. Participant observation of team meetings was performed by all team members involved in the programme and in-depth interviews were conducted by two external research assistants with team members (n = 22). A deductive thematic analysis using components of logic models as coding categories was conducted. Data were pooled in the first version of the Logic Model, which was refined in research team meetings with patient partners. The final version was validated by all team members.

resultsThe Logic Model highlights the importance of integrating PE into the project before its commencement, with appropriate support in terms of funding and time allocation. The governance structure and leadership of both principal investigators and patient partners have significant effects on PE activities and outcomes. As an empirical and standardized illustration that facilitates a shared understanding, the Logic Model provides guidance for maximizing the impact of patient partnership in various contexts for research, patients, providers and health care.

conclusionThe Logic Model will help academic researchers, decision makers and patient partners plan, operationalize, and assess PE in implementation research for optimal outcomes. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient partners from the PriCARE research programme contributed to developing the research objectives and designing, developing and validating data collection tools, producing data, developing and validating the Logic Model and reviewing the manuscript.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationCanadaData CollectionHumanshealth implementation researchlogic modelpatient engagementpatient involvementpatient partnership in research

Identifiers

PMID37309078
PMCPMC10485341
OpenAlexW4380422624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.