ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2023
Genetic gain and inbreeding from simulation of different genomic mating schemes for pig improvement.
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and application of a 5K targeted liquid SNP panel for Hetian chickens based on genotyping by targeted sequencing.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Restructuring breeding programs 2: Assortative mating for improved commercial genetic gain when using optimum contribution selection and diversity introduction.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Probabilities of two alleles being identity by state at unobserved loci predicted by observed loci in cattle populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A genome-structure adaptive framework for ROH-based inbreeding estimation in Penaeus vannamei.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Valorization of feral pigs in the tropics, from the genetic characterization to the re-domestication.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Runs of Homozygosity Preliminary Investigation in Pig Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Gene Editing for Enhanced Swine Production: Current Advances and Prospects.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- The effects of runs-of-homozygosity on pig domestication and breeding.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of genomic mating approach based on genetic algorithms for long-term selection in Huaxi cattle.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- A Mutation Losing an RBP-Binding Site in the LncRNA NORSF Transcript Influences Granulosa Cell Apoptosis and Sow Fertility.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Genome-wide detections for runs of homozygosity and selective signatures reveal novel candidate genes under domestication in chickens.BMC genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic selection involves choosing as parents those elite individuals with the higher genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) to accelerate the speed of genetic improvement in domestic animals. But after multi-generation selection, the rate of inbreeding and the occurrence of homozygous harmful alleles might increase, which would reduce performance and genetic diversity. To mitigate the above problems, we can utilize genomic mating (GM) based upon optimal mate allocation to construct the best genotypic combinations in the next generation. In this study, we used stochastic simulation to investigate the impact of various factors on the efficiencies of GM to optimize pairing combinations after genomic selection of candidates in a pig population. These factors included: the algorithm used to derive inbreeding coefficients; the trait heritability (0.1, 0.3 or 0.5); the kind of GM scheme (focused average GEBV or inbreeding); the approach for computing the genomic relationship matrix (by SNP or runs of homozygosity (ROH)). The outcomes were compared to three traditional mating schemes (random, positive assortative or negative assortative matings). In addition, the performance of the GM approach was tested on real datasets obtained from a Large White pig breeding population.
resultsGenomic mating outperforms other approaches in limiting the inbreeding accumulation for the same expected genetic gain. The use of ROH-based genealogical relatedness in GM achieved faster genetic gains than using relatedness based on individual SNPs. The G
conclusionCompared with traditional mating schemes, genomic mating can not only achieve sustainable genetic progress but also effectively control the rates of inbreeding accumulation in the population. Our findings demonstrated that breeders should consider using genomic mating for genetic improvement of pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.