Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308979›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Improving the COI DNA barcoding library for Neotropical phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).

Laura Posada-López, Bruno Leite Rodrigues, Ivan Dario Velez, Sandra Uribe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Posada-LópezPECET (Programa de Estudio y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. lcposada@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-1997
Bruno Leite RodriguesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública (FSP/USP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-1710
Ivan Dario VelezPECET (Programa de Estudio y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-4662
Sandra UribeGrupo de Investigación en Sistemática Molecular, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Campus, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4762-0552
Universidad de Antioquia · COInstituto de Saúde · BRUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS) 860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sand fly species are traditionally identified using morphological traits, though this method is hampered by the presence of cryptic species. DNA barcoding is a widely used tool in the case of insects of medical importance, where it is necessary to know quickly which species are present in a transmission area. Here, we assess the usefulness of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) DNA barcoding as a practical tool for species identification, correct assignment of isomorphic females, and to evaluate the detection of cryptic diversity that occurs in the same species. A fragment of the COI gene was used to generate 156 new barcode sequences for sand flies from different countries of the Neotropical region, mainly Colombia, which had been identified morphologically as 43 species. The sequencing of the COI gene allowed the detection of cryptic diversity within species and correctly associated isomorphic females with males identified by morphology. The maximum intraspecific genetic distances ranged from 0 to 8.32% and 0 to 8.92% using uncorrected p distances and the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model, respectively. The minimum interspecific distance (nearest neighbor) for each species ranged from 1.5 to 14.14% and 1.51 to 15.7% using p and K2P distances, respectively. Three species had more than 3% maximum intraspecific distance: Psychodopygus panamensis, Micropygomyia cayennensis cayennensis, and Pintomyia evansi. They also were split into at least two molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) each, using different species delimitation algorithms. Regarding interspecific genetic distances, the species of the genera Nyssomyia and Trichophoromyia generated values lower than 3% (except Nyssomyia ylephiletor and Ny. trapidoi). However, the maximum intraspecific distances did not exceed these values, indicating the presence of a barcode gap despite their proximity. Also, nine sand fly species were DNA barcoded for the first time: Evandromyia georgii, Lutzomyia sherlocki, Ny. ylephiletor, Ny. yuilli pajoti, Psathyromyia punctigeniculata, Sciopemyia preclara, Trichopygomyia triramula, Trichophoromyia howardi, and Th. velezbernali. The COI DNA barcode analysis enabled the correct delimitation of several Neotropical sand fly species from South and Central America and raised questions about the presence of cryptic species for some taxa, which should be further assessed.

Indexed as

PhlebotomusPsychodidaeAlgorithmsAnimalsCentral AmericaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFemaleMaleBarcodingMolecular systematicsMolecular taxonomyPhlebotominaeSingle-locusSpecies delimitation

Identifiers

PMID37308979
PMCPMC10259023
OpenAlexW4380363165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.