Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308928›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Procedure-related pain during CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsies of lung lesions: a prospective study.

Shou-Xin Yang, Mai-Lin Chen, Lei Xie, Hai-Bin Zhu, Yu-Liang Liu, Rui-Jia Sun, Bo Zhao, Xu-Bo Deng, Xiao-Ting Li, Ying-Shi Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shou-Xin Yang *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Mai-Lin Chen *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Lei Xie *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, 515041, China.
Hai-Bin ZhuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Yu-Liang LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Rui-Jia SunKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Bo ZhaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xu-Bo DengKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xiao-Ting LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Ying-Shi SunKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China. sys27@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-1910
Peking University · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority' Ascent Plan DFL20191103Innovation Cultivation Program project of Peking University Cancer Hospital KC202212Science and Innovation Cultivation Program project of Peking University Cancer Hospital KC2312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existing data on the degree of pain in patients during CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of lung lesions are limited and the factors related to pain are unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and severity of pain reported during PTNB and to identify factors associated with increased reported pain.

methodsPatients who underwent PTNB from April 2022 to November 2022 were prospectively evaluated using the numeric rating scale, which assesses subjective pain based on a 0-10 scoring system (0 = no pain; 10 = the worst pain imaginable). The scale divides the scores into three categories: mild pain (1-3 points), moderate pain (4-6 points), and severe pain (7-10 points). Pain scores from 4 to 10 were considered significant pain. Demographic data of patients, lesion characteristics, biopsy variables, complications, the patient's subjective feelings, and pathological result data were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify variables associated with significant pain.

resultsWe enrolled 215 participants who underwent 215 biopsy procedures (mean age: 64.5 ± 9.3 years, 123 were men). The mean procedure-related pain score was 2 ± 2. Overall, 20% (43/215) of participants reported no pain (score of 0), 67.9% (146/215) reported pain scores of 1-3, 11.2% (24/215) reported scores of 4-6, and 0.9% (2/215) reported scores of 7 or higher. Furthermore, non-significant pain (scores of 0-3) was reported during 87.9% (189/215) of the procedures. In the adjusted model, significant pain was positively associated with lesions ≥ 34 mm (p = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 6.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.18, 21.85), a needle-pleural angle ≥ 77° (p = 0.047, OR = 2.44; 95% CI: 1.01, 5.89), and a procedure time ≥ 26.5 min (p = 0.031, OR = 3.11; 95% CI: 1.11, 8.73).

conclusionsMost participants reported no pain or mild pain from CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsies of lung lesions. However, those with a larger lesion, a greater needle-pleural angle, and a longer procedure time reported greater pain.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyPainAgedBiopsy, NeedleFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedImage-guided biopsyLungPain

Identifiers

PMID37308928
PMCPMC10259012
OpenAlexW4380364400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.