Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308923›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2023

Safety and incremental prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with known chronic kidney disease.

Théo Pezel, Thierry Unterseeh, Thomas Hovasse, Francesca Sanguineti, Philippe Garot, Stéphane Champagne, Solenn Toupin, Tania Ah-Sing, Alyssa Faradji, Martin Nicol and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Théo PezelUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Inserm UMRS 942, 75010, Paris, France.
Thierry UnterseehCMR Department-ICPS, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, 6 Avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300, Massy, France.
Thomas HovasseCMR Department-ICPS, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, 6 Avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300, Massy, France.
Francesca SanguinetiCMR Department-ICPS, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, 6 Avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300, Massy, France.
Philippe GarotCMR Department-ICPS, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, 6 Avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300, Massy, France.
Stéphane ChampagneCMR Department-ICPS, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, 6 Avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300, Massy, France.
Solenn ToupinSiemens Healthcare France, 93200, Saint-Denis, France.
Tania Ah-SingUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, 75010, Paris, France.
Alyssa FaradjiUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, 75010, Paris, France.
Martin NicolUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Inserm UMRS 942, 75010, Paris, France.
Lounis HamziUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, 75010, Paris, France.
Jean Guillaume DillingerUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Inserm UMRS 942, 75010, Paris, France.
Patrick HenryUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, Inserm UMRS 942, 75010, Paris, France.
Valérie BoussonUniversité de Paris Cité, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP, 75010, Paris, France.
Jérôme GarotCMR Department-ICPS, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, 6 Avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300, Massy, France. jgarot@angio-icps.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3714-1256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although several studies have demonstrated the consistently high prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), its prognostic value in patients with CKD is not well established. We aimed to assess the safety and the incremental prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in consecutive symptomatic patients with known CKD.

methodsBetween 2008 and 2021, we conducted a retrospective dual center study with all consecutive symptomatic patients with known stage 3 CKD, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m

resultsOf 825 patients with known CKD (71.4 ± 8.8 years, 70% men), 769 (93%) completed the CMR protocol. Follow-up was available in 702 (91%) (median follow-up 6.4 (4.0-8.2) years). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe adverse event related to the injection of gadolinium or cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The presence of inducible ischemia was associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 12.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.50-20.8; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were independent predictors of MACE (HR 15.5; 95% CI 7.72 to 30.9; and HR 4.67 [95% CI 2.83-7.68]; respectively, both p < 0.001). After adjustment, stress CMR findings showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional risk factors (C-statistic improvement: 0.13; NRI = 0.477; IDI = 0.049).

conclusionsIn patients with known stage 3 CKD, stress CMR is safe and its findings have an incremental prognostic value to predict MACE over traditional risk factors.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaNephrogenic Fibrosing DermopathyFemaleGadoliniumHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMalePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadoliniumCardiovascular eventsCardiovascular magnetic resonanceChronic kidney diseaseMyocardial ischemiaPrognosisStress testingUnrecognized myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID37308923
PMCPMC10259036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.