Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308830›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Generation of sheep with defined FecB

Shiwei Zhou, Laura Johanna Lenk, Yawei Gao, Yuhui Wang, Xiaoe Zhao, Menghao Pan, Shuhong Huang, Kexin Sun, Peter Kalds, Qi Luo and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing System in Sheep (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Shiwei Zhou *College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Laura Johanna Lenk *Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 31535, Neustadt, Germany.
Yawei Gao *Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Yuhui WangKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Xiaoe ZhaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Menghao PanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Shuhong HuangKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Kexin SunKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Peter KaldsKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Qi LuoKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Simon LillicoThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Tad SonstegardRecombinetics, St. Paul, MN, 55121, USA.
Ute I SchollCenter of Functional Genomics, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Baohua MaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Bjoern PetersenInstitute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 31535, Neustadt, Germany. bjoern.petersen@fli.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-4863
Yulin ChenKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China. chenyulin@nwafu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-4055
Xiaolong WangKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China. xiaolongwang@nwafu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-1344
Northwest A&F University · CNFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DENorth West Agriculture and Forestry University · CNArish University · EGBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DERecombinetics (United States) · USRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-39China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2021M700111Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, CRC 1365National Natural Science Foundation of China 32161143010National Natural Science Foundation of China 32202646National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRewriting the genomes of living organisms has been a long-standing aim in the biological sciences. The revelation of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology has revolutionized the entire biological field. Since its emergence, this technology has been widely applied to induce gene knockouts, insertions, deletions, and base substitutions. However, the classical version of this system was imperfect for inducing or correcting desired mutations. A subsequent development generated more advanced classes, including cytosine and adenine base editors, which can be used to achieve single nucleotide substitutions. Nevertheless, these advanced systems still suffer from several limitations, such as the inability to edit loci without a suitable PAM sequence and to induce base transversions. On the other hand, the recently emerged prime editors (PEs) can achieve all possible single nucleotide substitutions as well as targeted insertions and deletions, which show promising potential to alter and correct the genomes of various organisms. Of note, the application of PE to edit livestock genomes has not been reported yet.

resultsIn this study, using PE, we successfully generated sheep with two agriculturally significant mutations, including the fecundity-related FecB

conclusionsOur study demonstrates the potential of the PE system to edit the genomes of large animals for the induction of economically desired mutations and for modeling human diseases. Although prime-edited sheep and porcine blastocysts could be generated, the editing frequencies are still unsatisfactory, highlighting the need for optimizations in the PE system for efficient generation of large animals with customized traits.

Indexed as

BlastocystPoint MutationAnimalsG Protein-Coupled Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium ChannelsHumansLivestockMutationNucleotidesSheepSwineG Protein-Coupled Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium ChannelsKCNJ5 protein, humanNucleotidesGenetic improvementHuman disease modelingPigsPrime editingSheep

Identifiers

PMID37308830
PMCPMC10258939
OpenAlexW4380244155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.