Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308716›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2023

Insights into recent findings and clinical application of YAP and TAZ in cancer.

J Matthew Franklin, Zhengming Wu, Kun-Liang Guan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
42.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of Ferredoxin 1Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Matthew FranklinDepartment of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Zhengming WuDepartment of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kun-Liang GuanDepartment of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. kuguan@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1892-0174
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research have mapped out the basic mechanics of the Hippo pathway. The paralogues Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), as the central transcription control module of the Hippo pathway, have long been implicated in the progression of various human cancers. The current literature regarding oncogenic YAP and TAZ activities consists mostly of context-specific mechanisms and treatments of human cancers. Furthermore, a growing number of studies demonstrate tumour-suppressor functions of YAP and TAZ. In this Review we aim to synthesize an integrated perspective of the many disparate findings regarding YAP and TAZ in cancer. We then conclude with the various strategies for targeting and treating YAP- and TAZ-dependent cancers.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingNeoplasmsTranscriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif ProteinsYAP-Signaling ProteinsHumansPhosphoproteinsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingPhosphoproteinsTranscriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif ProteinsTranscription FactorsWWTR1 protein, humanYAP-Signaling Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37308716
OpenAlexW4380357753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.