Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308692›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2024

Geographical variation in treated psychotic and other mental disorders in Finland by region and urbanicity.

Kimmo Suokas, Olli Kurkela, Jaakko Nevalainen, Jaana Suvisaari, Christian Hakulinen, Olli Kampman, Sami Pirkola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimmo SuokasFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland, Arvo Ylpön katu 34 (Arvo 1), 33014. kimmo.suokas@tuni.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-6343
Olli KurkelaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland, Arvo Ylpön katu 34 (Arvo 1), 33014.
Jaakko NevalainenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland, Arvo Ylpön katu 34 (Arvo 1), 33014.
Jaana SuvisaariNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Christian HakulinenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli KampmanFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Sami PirkolaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland, Arvo Ylpön katu 34 (Arvo 1), 33014.

Funding

European Research Council 101040247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Finland, prevalence of schizophrenia is higher in the eastern and northern regions and co-occurs with the distribution of schizophrenia polygenic risk scores. Both genetic and environmental factors have been hypothesized to contribute to this variation. We aimed to examine the prevalence of psychotic and other mental disorders by region and degree of urbanicity, and the impacts of socio-economic adjustments on these associations.

methodsNationwide population registers from 2011 to 2017 and healthcare registers from 1975 to 2017. We used 19 administrative and three aggregate regions based on the distribution of schizophrenia polygenic risk scores, and a seven-level urban-rural classification. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated by Poisson regression models and adjusted for gender, age, and calendar year (basic adjustments), and Finnish origin, residential history, urbanicity, household income, economic activity, and physical comorbidity (additional adjustments) on an individual level. Average marginal effects were used to visualize interaction effects between region and urbanicity.

resultsA total of 5,898,180 individuals were observed. All mental disorders were slightly more prevalent (PR 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.03]), and psychotic disorders (1.11 [1.10-1.12]) and schizophrenia (1.19 [1.17-1.21]) considerably more prevalent in eastern and northern than in western coastal regions. After the additional adjustments, however, the PRs were 0.95 (0.95-0.96), 1.00 (0.99-1.01), and 1.03 (1.02-1.04), respectively. Urban residence was associated with increased prevalence of psychotic disorders across all regions (adjusted PR 1.21 [1.20-1.22]).

conclusionAfter adjusting for socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors, the within-country distribution of mental disorders no longer followed the traditional east-west gradient. Urban-rural differences, on the other hand, persisted after the adjustments.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaFinlandHumansRisk FactorsUrban PopulationGeographicalMental disordersPrevalenceSchizophreniaSocial determinantsUrbanicity

Identifiers

PMID37308692
PMCPMC10799825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.