Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308578›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Effect of the association of coagulation/flocculation, hydrodynamic cavitation, ozonation and activated carbon in landfill leachate treatment system.

Janaina de Melo Franco Domingos, Thiago de Alencar Neves, Djalma Lucas de Sousa Maia, Rebeca Carvalho Siqueira, Marcus Vinícius Araújo Marques, Oswaldo Luiz Alves, José Roberto Guimarães, Marcelo Antunes Nolasco, André Henrique Rosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Janaina de Melo Franco DomingosSchool of Arts, Science and Humanities, University of São Paulo (Universidade de São Paulo), São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago de Alencar NevesDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. thiago@desa.ufmg.br.
Djalma Lucas de Sousa MaiaTechnological and Agricultural Center of the State of Bahia (Cetab), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Rebeca Carvalho SiqueiraFaculty of Civil Engineering, State University of Campinas (Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Marcus Vinícius Araújo MarquesDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Oswaldo Luiz AlvesFaculty of Civil Engineering, State University of Campinas (Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
José Roberto GuimarãesFaculty of Civil Engineering, State University of Campinas (Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Antunes NolascoSchool of Arts, Science and Humanities, University of São Paulo (Universidade de São Paulo), São Paulo, Brazil.
André Henrique RosaInstitute of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual de São Paulo), São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mature landfill wastewater is a complex effluent due to its low biodegradability and high organic matter content. Currently, mature leachate is treated on-site or transported to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Many WWTPs do not have the capacity to receive mature leachate due to its high organic load leading to an increase in the cost of transportation to treatment plants more adapted to this type of wastewater and the possibility of environmental impacts. Many techniques are used in the treatment of mature leachates, such as coagulation/flocculation, biological reactors, membranes, and advanced oxidative processes. However, the isolated application of these techniques does not achieve efficiency to meet environmental standards. In this regard, this work developed a compact system that combines coagulation and flocculation (1st Stage), hydrodynamic cavitation and ozonation (2nd Stage), and activated carbon polishing (3rd Stage) for the treatment of mature landfill leachate. The synergetic combination of physicochemical and advanced oxidative processes showed a chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of over 90% in less than three hours of treatment using the bioflocculant PGα21Ca. Also, the almost absolute removal of apparent color and turbidity was achieved. The remaining CODs of the treated mature leachate were lower when compared to typical domestic sewage of large capitals (COD ~ 600 mg L

Identifiers

PMID37308578
PMCPMC10261092
OpenAlexW4380356880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.