ArticleScientific reports2023
Formalin-evoked pain triggers sex-specific behavior and spinal immune response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Influence of Testosterone on Pain Perception and Modulation Among Men with Low and Normal Testosterone Concentrations.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Hericenone C exhibits anti-nociceptive effects through RORα-mediated suppression of TLR4 transcription.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Emerging roles of lipocalin-2-mediated neuroimmune interactions in chronic pain and itch.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Ganoderma tsuage promotes pain sensitivity in aging mice.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mounting evidence shows sex-related differences in the experience of pain with women suffering more from chronic pain than men. Yet, our understanding of the biological basis underlying those differences remains incomplete. Using an adapted model of formalin-induced chemical/inflammatory pain, we report here that in contrast to male mice, females distinctly display two types of nocifensive responses to formalin, distinguishable by the duration of the interphase. Females in proestrus and in metestrus exhibited respectively a short-lasting and a long-lasting interphase, underscoring the influence of the estrus cycle on the duration of the interphase, rather than the transcriptional content of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (DHSC). Additionally, deep RNA-sequencing of DHSC showed that formalin-evoked pain was accompanied by a male-preponderant enrichment in genes associated with the immune modulation of pain, revealing an unanticipated contribution of neutrophils. Taking advantage of the male-enriched transcript encoding the neutrophil associated protein Lipocalin 2 (Lcn2) and using flow cytometry, we confirmed that formalin triggered the recruitment of LCN2-expressing neutrophils in the pia mater of spinal meninges, preferentially in males. Our data consolidate the contribution of female estrus cycle to pain perception and provide evidence supporting a sex-specific immune regulation of formalin-evoked pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.