Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308249›Full record

ArticleRMD open2023

Disease modification achievement in patients with lupus nephritis in a real-life setting: mission impossible?

Alexandros Panagiotopoulos, Eleni Kapsia, Ioannis Michelakis, John Boletis, Smaragdi Marinaki, Petros P Sfikakis, Maria G Tektonidou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lupus nephritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandros Panagiotopoulos *Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Eleni Kapsia *Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis MichelakisMedical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3314-3329
John BoletisDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Smaragdi MarinakiDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Petros P SfikakisRheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Maria G TektonidouRheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece mtektonidou@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2238-0975
Laiko General Hospital of Athens · GRFrontier Science Foundation-Hellas · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA preliminary definition of disease modification (DM) in lupus nephritis (LN) was recently developed focusing on long-term remission and damage prevention, with minimal treatment-associated toxicity. We aimed to further specify aspects of DM criteria in LN, assess DM achievement in a real-world setting and examine potential DM predictors and long-term outcomes.

methodsWe collected clinical/laboratory and histological inception cohort data from biopsy-proven LN patients (82% females) with ≥72 months follow-up at two joint academic centres. Specific criteria for 24-hour proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal flares and glucocorticoids dose were set at three time frames (months 0-12, 13-60 and 72) to assess DM. In the first model, DM was achieved if patients fulfilled all four criteria at all three time frames (achievers). In the second model, the continued glucocorticoids reduction criterion was excluded. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Possible different trends in DM achievement between past and recent decades were also investigated.

resultsDM was achieved by 60% of patients, increased to 70% when glucocorticoids excluded from DM criteria. 24-hour proteinuria at 9 months predicted DM achievement (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.97, p=0.03), but none of baseline characteristics. Among patients with >72 month follow-up, non-achievers had worse renal outcomes (flares, >30% proteinuria increase, eGFR decline) than achievers at the end of follow-up (median 138 months). Patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2005 were found to have significantly lower percentages of DM achievement and met less often the glucocorticoids dose reduction criterion in all three time frames, compared with those diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 (p=0.006 and p<0.01, respectively).

conclusionsDM was achieved by only 60% of LN patients in a real-life setting, partly due to lack of glucocorticoids dose target attainment, while DM failure was associated with worse long-term renal outcomes. This may imply limitations in the effectiveness or implementation of current LN treatments, supporting the need for novel therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Lupus NephritisFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansKidneyMaleProteinuriaRisk FactorsGlucocorticoidsautoimmune diseaseslupus erythematosus, systemiclupus nephritis

Identifiers

PMID37308249
PMCPMC10277535
OpenAlexW4380362159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.