Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37308105›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association2023

Insulin Secretion Capacity as a Crucial Feature to Distinguish Type 1 From Type 2 Diabetes and to Indicate the Need for Insulin Therapy - A Critical Discussion of the ADA/EASD Consensus Statement on the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults.

Andreas Fritsche

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Call for Standardization of C-Peptide Measurement.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas FritscheDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen.
German Center for Diabetes Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recently published consensus statement on the treatment and management of type 1 diabetes issued by experts from the American (ADA) and European (EASD) diabetes societies, measurement of endogenous insulin secretion using fasting C-peptide is recommended as a diagnostic criterion. In contrast, our group recently suggested fasting C-peptide/glucose ratio (CGR) for the determination of endogenous insulin secretion. In addition, this ratio may turn out as a potential decision aid for pathophysiologically based differential therapy of diabetes. In this comment, the following points will be discussed: i) CGR as the basis of differential diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, ii) CGR as the basis of treatment decisions for or against insulin in diabetes, and iii) the ease of application of CGR in clinical practice. The use of CGR may complement the ADA/EASD recommendations and should provide a practical application in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultC-PeptideHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin SecretionUnited StatesC-PeptideHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID37308105
PMCPMC10581093
OpenAlexW4380363177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.