Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37307876›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2023

Predicting Prostate Cancer Molecular Subtype With Deep Learning on Histopathologic Images.

Eric Erak, Lia DePaula Oliveira, Adrianna A Mendes, Oluwademilade Dairo, Onur Ertunc, Ibrahim Kulac, Javier A Baena-Del Valle, Tracy Jones, Jessica L Hicks, Stephanie Glavaris and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Eric ErakDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Lia DePaula OliveiraDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Adrianna A MendesDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Oluwademilade DairoDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Onur ErtuncDepartment of Pathology, Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey.
Ibrahim KulacKoç University School of Medicine, Turkey.
Javier A Baena-Del ValleFundacion Santa Fe de Bogota University Hospital, Columbia.
Tracy JonesDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Jessica L HicksDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Stephanie GlavarisDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Gunes GunerHacettepe University, Turkey.
Igor Damasceno VidalDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Alabama.
Mark MarkowskiDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Claire de la CalleDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Bruce J TrockDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Avaneesh MeenaAIRA Matrix Private Limited, India.
Uttara JoshiAIRA Matrix Private Limited, India.
Chaith KondraguntaAIRA Matrix Private Limited, India.
Saikiran BonthuAIRA Matrix Private Limited, India.
Nitin SinghalAIRA Matrix Private Limited, India.
Angelo M De MarzoDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Tamara L LotanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Electronic address: tlotan1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USMatrix Research (United States) · USFundación Santa Fe de Bogotá · COHacettepe University · TRKoç University · TRSüleyman Demirel University · TRUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
TRANSGENIC MODELS FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND AUTOIMMUNITYP50CA058236 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DENMEADE, SAMUEL R · 1992 to 2020
$43.9M
Multidiciplinary Integrative Genomic Approach to Distinguish Lethal from Indolent Prostate Cancer in Men of Europena and African AncestryU01CA196390 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DE MARZO, ANGELO MICHAEL, PIENTA, KENNETH J. · 2015 to 2020
$5.8M
Opportunities for Pathology Trainees in Cancer ResearchT32CA193145 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERS, ROBERT A., EBERHART, CHARLES G · 2015 to 2025
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058236NCI NIH HHS T32 CA193145NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic examination of prostate cancer has failed to reveal a reproducible association between molecular and morphologic features. However, deep-learning algorithms trained on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSI) may outperform the human eye and help to screen for clinically-relevant genomic alterations. We created deep-learning algorithms to identify prostate tumors with underlying ETS-related gene (ERG) fusions or PTEN deletions using the following 4 stages: (1) automated tumor identification, (2) feature representation learning, (3) classification, and (4) explainability map generation. A novel transformer-based hierarchical architecture was trained on a single representative WSI of the dominant tumor nodule from a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort with known ERG/PTEN status (n = 224 and n = 205, respectively). Two distinct vision transformer-based networks were used for feature extraction, and a distinct transformer-based model was used for classification. The ERG algorithm performance was validated across 3 RP cohorts, including 64 WSI from the pretraining cohort (AUC, 0.91) and 248 and 375 WSI from 2 independent RP cohorts (AUC, 0.86 and 0.89, respectively). In addition, we tested the ERG algorithm performance in 2 needle biopsy cohorts comprised of 179 and 148 WSI (AUC, 0.78 and 0.80, respectively). Focusing on cases with homogeneous (clonal) PTEN status, PTEN algorithm performance was assessed using 50 WSI reserved from the pretraining cohort (AUC, 0.81), 201 and 337 WSI from 2 independent RP cohorts (AUC, 0.72 and 0.80, respectively), and 151 WSI from a needle biopsy cohort (AUC, 0.75). For explainability, the PTEN algorithm was also applied to 19 WSI with heterogeneous (subclonal) PTEN loss, where the percentage tumor area with predicted PTEN loss correlated with that based on immunohistochemistry (r = 0.58, P = .0097). These deep-learning algorithms to predict ERG/PTEN status prove that H&E images can be used to screen for underlying genomic alterations in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsPTEN PhosphohydrolaseAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleTranscriptional Regulator ERGBiomarkers, TumorERG protein, humanPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanTranscriptional Regulator ERGartificial intelligencedeep-learningERGprostatePTEN

Identifiers

PMID37307876
PMCPMC11225718
OpenAlexW4380202027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.