Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37307866›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Identifying good practices for detecting inter-regional linear functional connectivity from EEG.

Franziska Pellegrini, Arnaud Delorme, Vadim Nikulin, Stefan Haufe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska PellegriniCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Philippstraße 13, Berlin, 10117, Germany. Electronic address: franziska.pellegrini@charite.de.
Arnaud DelormeSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States.
Vadim NikulinDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Stephanstraße 1a, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Stefan HaufeCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Philippstraße 13, Berlin, 10117, Germany; Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin, 10623, Germany; Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig und Berlin, Abbestraße 2-12, Berlin, 10587, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregating voxel-level statistical dependencies between multivariate time series is an important intermediate step when characterising functional connectivity (FC) between larger brain regions. However, there are numerous ways in which voxel-level data can be aggregated into inter-regional FC, and the advantages of each of these approaches are currently unclear. In this study we generate ground-truth data and compare the performances of various pipelines that estimate directed and undirected linear phase-to-phase FC between regions. We test the ability of several existing and novel FC analysis pipelines to identify the true regions within which connectivity was simulated. We test various inverse modelling algorithms, strategies to aggregate time series within regions, and connectivity metrics. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of the number of interactions, the signal-to-noise ratio, the noise mix, the interaction time delay, and the number of active sources per region on the ability of detecting phase-to-phase FC. Throughout all simulated scenarios, lowest performance is obtained with pipelines involving the absolute value of coherency. Further, the combination of dynamic imaging of coherent sources (DICS) beamforming with directed FC metrics that aggregate information across multiple frequencies leads to unsatisfactory results. Pipelines that show promising results with our simulated pseudo-EEG data involve the following steps: (1) Source projection using the linearly-constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamformer. (2) Principal component analysis (PCA) using the same fixed number of components within every region. (3) Calculation of the multivariate interaction measure (MIM) for every region pair to assess undirected phase-to-phase FC, or calculation of time-reversed Granger Causality (TRGC) to assess directed phase-to-phase FC. We formulate recommendations based on these results that may increase the validity of future experimental connectivity studies. We further introduce the free ROIconnect plugin for the EEGLAB toolbox that includes the recommended methods and pipelines that are presented here. We show an exemplary application of the best performing pipeline to the analysis of EEG data recorded during motor imagery.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationHumansElectroencephalographyInter-regional functional connectivityLinearly-constrained minimum variance beamformingMultivariate interaction measureSimulationSource reconstructionTime-reversed granger causality

Identifiers

PMID37307866
PMCPMC10374983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.