Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37307519›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

Improving community health worker treatment for malaria, diarrhoea, and pneumonia in Uganda through inSCALE community and mHealth innovations: A cluster randomised controlled trial.

Karin Källander, Seyi Soremekun, Daniel Ll Strachan, Zelee Hill, Frida Kasteng, Edmound Kertho, Agnes Nanyonjo, Guus Ten Asbroek, Maureen Nakirunda, Patrick Lumumba and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01972321 (Integrated Community Case Management of Common Childhood Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01972321 nacompletednot on this map

Integrated Community Case Management of Common Childhood Diseases: Mozambique and Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorMalaria ConsortiumRan2013 to 2015Enrolled2,289ConditionsMalaria, Pneumonia, DiarrhoeaArmsTechnology supported supervision, Community supported supervision, Integrated community case management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Karin KällanderMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5778-5780
Seyi SoremekunDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel Ll StrachanInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Zelee HillInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Frida KastengDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Edmound KerthoMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Agnes NanyonjoDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guus Ten AsbroekAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maureen NakirundaMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick LumumbaMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Godfrey AyebaleMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Benson BagorogozaMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Anna VassallDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sylvia MeekMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
James TibenderanaMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Raghu LingamDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Betty KirkwoodDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Malaria Consortium · UGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEMalaria Consortium · GBAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLThe University of Melbourne · AUUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity College London · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inSCALE cluster randomised controlled trial in Uganda evaluated two interventions, mHealth and Village Health Clubs (VHCs) which aimed to improve Community Health Worker (CHW) treatment for malaria, diarrhoea, and pneumonia within the national Integrated Community Case Management (iCCM) programme. The interventions were compared with standard care in a control arm. In a cluster randomised trial, 39 sub-counties in Midwest Uganda, covering 3167 CHWs, were randomly allocated to mHealth; VHC or usual care (control) arms. Household surveys captured parent-reported child illness, care seeking and treatment practices. Intention-to-treat analysis estimated the proportion of appropriately treated children with malaria, diarrhoea, and pneumonia according to WHO informed national guidelines. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01972321). Between April-June 2014, 7679 households were surveyed; 2806 children were found with malaria, diarrhoea, or pneumonia symptoms in the last one month. Appropriate treatment was 11% higher in the mHealth compared to the control arm (risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.02, 1.21; p = 0.018). The largest effect was on appropriate treatment for diarrhoea (RR 1.39; 95% CI 0.90, 2.15; p = 0.134). The VHC intervention increased appropriate treatment by 9% (RR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01, 1.18; p = 0.059), again with largest effect on treatment of diarrhoea (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04, 2.34, p = 0.030). CHWs provided the highest levels of appropriate treatment compared to other providers. However, improvements in appropriate treatment were observed at health facilities and pharmacies, with CHW appropriate treatment the same across the arms. The rate of CHW attrition in both intervention arms was less than half that of the control arm; adjusted risk difference mHealth arm -4.42% (95% CI -8.54, -0.29, p = 0.037) and VHC arm -4.75% (95% CI -8.74, -0.76, p = 0.021). Appropriate treatment by CHWs was encouragingly high across arms. The inSCALE mHealth and VHC interventions have the potential to reduce CHW attrition and improve the care quality for sick children, but not through improved CHW management as we had hypothesised. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01972321).

Identifiers

PMID37307519
PMCPMC10260253
OpenAlexW4380302251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.