Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37307278›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Efficacy of drug treatment for severe melioidosis and eradication treatment of melioidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Krit Harncharoenkul, Kamonporn Poramathikul, Kittijarankon Phontham, Parat Boonyarangka, Worachet Kuntawunginn, Michele Spring, Daniel Boudreaux, Jeffrey Livezey, Narisara Chantratita

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disseminated melioidosis due to ceftazidime-resistant Burkholderia pseudomallei in a Spanish traveler.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Infection and drug resistance · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thunyarat AnothaisintaweeDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-8536
Krit HarncharoenkulDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kamonporn PoramathikulDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kittijarankon PhonthamDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Parat BoonyarangkaDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worachet KuntawunginnDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Michele SpringDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Daniel BoudreauxDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jeffrey LivezeyDepartment of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narisara ChantratitaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of all available treatments for severe melioidosis in decreasing hospital mortality and to identify eradication therapies with low disease recurrence rates and minimal risk of adverse drug events (AEs). METHODOLOGY: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) were searched from Medline and Scopus databases from their inception until July 31, 2022. RCTs that compared the efficacy between treatment regimens for severe melioidosis or eradication therapy of melioidosis, measured outcomes of in-hospital mortality, disease recurrence, drug discontinuation, or AEs, were included for review. A two-stage NMA with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of treatment regimens. PRINCIPAL

findingsFourteen RCTs were included in the review. Ceftazidime plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), ceftazidime plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and cefoperazone-sulbactam plus TMP-SMX had a lower mortality rate than other treatments and were ranked as the top three most appropriate treatments for severe melioidosis with the SUCRA of 79.7%, 66.6%, and 55.7%, respectively. However, these results were not statistically significant. For eradication therapy, treatment with doxycycline monotherapy for 20 weeks was associated with a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence than regimens containing TMP-SMX (i.e.,TMP-SMX for 20 weeks, TMP-SMX plus doxycycline plus chloramphenicol for more than 12 weeks, and TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for more than 12 weeks). According to the SUCRA, TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was ranked as the most efficacious eradication treatment (87.7%) with the lowest chance of drug discontinuation (86.4%), while TMP-SMX for 12 weeks had the lowest risk of AEs (95.6%).

conclusionOur results found a non-significant benefit of ceftazidime plus G-CSF and ceftazidime plus TMP-SMX over other treatments for severe melioidosis. TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was associated with a lower recurrence rate and minimal risk of adverse drug events compared to other eradication treatments. However, the validity of our NMA may be compromised by the limited number of included studies and discrepancies in certain study parameters. Thus, additional well-designed RCTs are needed to improve the therapy of melioidosis.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMelioidosisCeftazidimeDoxycyclineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationCeftazidimeDoxycyclineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID37307278
PMCPMC10289671
OpenAlexW4380357006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.