Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37307061›Full record

ArticleThe CRISPR journal2023

Multiplex Editing of the

Yen-Ho Chen, Shakuntala Sharma, William P Bewg, Liang-Jiao Xue, Cole R Gizelbach, Chung-Jui Tsai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The CRISPR journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Plant engineering: advances, bottlenecks, and promise.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Engineering custom morpho- and chemotypes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yen-Ho ChenDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-6235
Shakuntala SharmaWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
William P BewgDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Liang-Jiao XueWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Cole R GizelbachDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; and College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Chung-Jui TsaiDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9282-7704
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has been deployed for precision mutagenesis in an ever-growing number of species, including agricultural crops and forest trees. Its application to closely linked genes with extremely high sequence similarities has been less explored. In this study, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to mutagenize a tandem array of seven

Indexed as

Gene EditingPopulusCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Copy Number VariationsMutagenesisTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID37307061
PMCPMC10460964
OpenAlexW4380291007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.