Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37307001›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of Mifepristone vs Placebo for Treatment of Adenomyosis With Pain Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xuan Che, Jianzhang Wang, Wenting Sun, Jiayi He, Qiming Wang, Danyang Zhu, Weili Zhu, Jing Zhang, Jie Dong, Jingui Xu and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03520439 (Mifepristone Versus Placebo to Treat Adenomyosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03520439 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Mifepristone Versus Placebo to Treat Adenomyosis: a Double-blind, Multicentre,Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorxinmei zhangRan2018 to 2019Enrolled134ConditionsAdenomyosisArmsMifepristone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Xuan CheWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianzhang WangWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Wenting SunWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiayi HeWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qiming WangNingbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Danyang ZhuThe First People's Hospital of Taizhou City, Taizhou, China.
Weili ZhuJiaxing University Affiliated Women and Children Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Jing ZhangThe Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Jie DongHuzhou Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Jingui XuQuzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Feiyun ZhengThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jianwei ZhouThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hanzhou, China.
Weidong ZhaoAnhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China.
Qiao LinTaizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, China.
Lingfang YeNingbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Xiumin ZhaoThe First People's Hospital of Taizhou City, Taizhou, China.
Zhengfen XuJiaxing University Affiliated Women and Children Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Yunyan ChenHuzhou Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Jing WangQuzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Wenlie WuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Lingyun ZhaiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hanzhou, China.
Yuanyuan ZhouAnhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China.
Jianguang ZhengChuangda Pharmaceutical Technology, Shanghai, China.
Xinmei ZhangWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNJiaxing University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNAnhui Provincial Hospital · CNHuzhou Women and Children's Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNTaizhou First People's Hospital · CNNingbo University Affiliated Hospital · CNQuzhou City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adenomyosis is a common chronic gynecological disorder, and its treatment is an unmet need. New therapies need to be developed. Mifepristone is being tested for adenomyosis treatment. Objective: To determine whether mifepristone is effective and safe for adenomyosis treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 10 hospitals in China. In total, 134 patients with adenomyosis pain symptoms were enrolled. Trial enrollment began in May 2018 and was completed in April 2019, and analyses were conducted from October 2019 to February 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive mifepristone 10 mg or placebo orally once a day for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the change in adenomyosis-associated dysmenorrhea intensity, evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the change in menstrual blood loss, increased level of hemoglobin in patients with anemia, CA125 level, platelet count, and uterine volume after 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, vital signs, gynecological examinations, and laboratory evaluations. Results: In total, 134 patients with adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea were randomly assigned, and 126 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, including 61 patients (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [4.6] years) randomized to receive mifepristone and 65 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [5.0] years) randomized to received the placebo. The characteristics of the included patients at baseline were similar between groups. The mean (SD) change in VAS score was -6.63 (1.92) in the mifepristone group and -0.95 (1.75) in the placebo group (P < .001). The total remission rates for dysmenorrhea in the mifepristone group were significantly better than those in the placebo group (effective remission: 56 patients [91.8%] vs 15 patients [23.1%]; complete remission: 54 patients [88.5%] vs 4 patients [6.2%]). All the secondary end points showed significant improvements after mifepristone treatment for menstrual blood loss, hemoglobin (mean [SD] change from baseline: 2.13 [1.38] g/dL vs 0.48 [0.97] g/dL; P < .001), CA125 (mean [SD] change from baseline: -62.23 [76.99] U/mL vs 26.89 [118.70] U/mL; P < .001), platelet count (mean [SD] change from baseline: -28.87 [54.30]×103/µL vs 2.06 [41.78]×103/µL; P < .001), and uterine volume (mean [SD] change from baseline: -29.32 [39.34] cm3 vs 18.39 [66.46] cm3; P < .001). Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between groups, and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial showed that mifepristone could be a new option for treating patients with adenomyosis, based on its efficacy and acceptable tolerability. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03520439.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisMifepristonePainAdultChinaDysmenorrheaFemaleHormone AntagonistsHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeHormone AntagonistsMifepristone

Identifiers

PMID37307001
PMCPMC10261993
OpenAlexW4380290500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.