Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306926›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023

Concurrent and discriminant validity and reliability of an Android App to assess time, velocity and power during sit-to-stand test in community-dwelling older adults.

Juan D Ruiz-Cárdenas, Alessio Montemurro, María Del Mar Martínez-García, Juan J Rodríguez-Juan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07135869 (Reliability and Discriminant Validity of a Mobile App for Detecting Muscle Fatigue in People With Cystic Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07135869 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Reliability and Discriminant Validity of a Mobile App for Detecting Muscle Fatigue in People With Cystic Fibrosis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsCystic Fibrosis (CF)ArmsOne minute sit-to-stand test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan D Ruiz-CárdenasPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Occupational Therapy, Universidad Católica de Murcia, Av. de los Jerónimos, 135, Guadalupe de Maciascoque, 30107, Murcia, Spain. jdruiz@ucam.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-4965
Alessio MontemurroPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Occupational Therapy, Universidad Católica de Murcia, Av. de los Jerónimos, 135, Guadalupe de Maciascoque, 30107, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4912-0535
María Del Mar Martínez-GarcíaPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Occupational Therapy, Universidad Católica de Murcia, Av. de los Jerónimos, 135, Guadalupe de Maciascoque, 30107, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-7129
Juan J Rodríguez-JuanPhysiotherapy Department, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de La Salud, 30120, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-6845

Funding

Fundación Séneca 21639/PDC/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNowadays, smartphones are equipped with the most sophisticated hardware which provides the opportunity to develop specific smartphone apps to analyze kinetic and kinematic parameters during sit-to-stand test in a clinical setting. The aims were to ascertain whether a new Android video-analysis based-App is comparable to the previously validated Apple-App for measuring time, velocity and power during sit-to-stand test, to determine its reliability and discriminant validity.

methodsOne-hundred sixty-one older adults (61-86 years) were recruited from an elderly social center. Sit-to-stand variables were simultaneously recorded through the Android and Apple-App. Their validity and inter-rater, intra-rater, and test-retest reliability was tested using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC

resultsExcellent reproducibility (ICC

conclusionThe new Sit-to-Stand App running on the Android operating system is comparable to the previously validated Apple App. Excellent reproducibility and acceptable-to-excellent discriminant validity were found.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSarcopeniaAgedExercise TestHumansIndependent LivingReproducibility of ResultsAgreementOlder adultsReliabilitySit-to-standSmartphoneValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.