Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306914›Full record

ArticleCancer treatment and research2023

Nutritional Assessment in Cancer Patients.

Muhammad Naveed Sheas, Syeda Ramsha Ali, Waseem Safdar, Muhammad Rizwan Tariq, Saeed Ahmed, Naveed Ahmad, Amna Hameed, Asma Saleem Qazi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer treatment and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic value of the HALP score in patients with testicular cancer: a retrospective study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Naveed SheasDepartment of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Ibadat International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Syeda Ramsha AliDepartment of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Ibadat International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Waseem SafdarDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. waseem.safdar@numspak.edu.pk.
Muhammad Rizwan TariqDepartment of Food Sciences, University of the Punjab, Quid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Saeed AhmedDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Naveed AhmadMultan College of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Multan Medical and Dental College, Multan, Pakistan.
Amna HameedDepartment of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Ibadat International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Asma Saleem QaziDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
National University of Medical Sciences · PKIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition in cancer patients is highly prevalent. The metabolic and physiologic changes associated with the disease and the side effects of treatment regimens all combine together to produce a detrimental effect on the patient's nutritional status. A poor nutritional status significantly reduces the efficacy of treatment methods and the patient's overall chances of survival. Therefore, an individualized nutrition care plan is essential to counter malnutrition in cancer. Nutritional assessment is the first step of this process which sets the foundation for developing an effective intervention plan. Currently, there is no single standard method for nutritional assessment in cancer. Hence, to get a true picture of the patient's nutritional state, a comprehensive analysis of all aspects of the patient's nutritional status is the only reliable strategy. The assessment includes anthropometric measurements and evaluation of body protein status, body fat, inflammation markers, and immune markers. A thorough clinical examination which factors in the medical history and physical signs, along with the dietary intake patterns of the patient, is also important components of nutritional assessment of cancer patients. To facilitate with the process, various nutritional screening tools like patient-generated subjective global assessment (PGSGA), nutrition risk screening (NRS), and malnutrition screening tool (MST) have been developed. While these tools have their own benefits, they only give a glimpse of the nutritional problems and do not bypass the need for a complete assessment employing various methods. This chapter covers all four of the elements of nutritional assessment for cancer patients in detail.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMalnutritionNeoplasmsHumansNutritional StatusNutrition Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37306914
OpenAlexW4380291636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.