Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306782›Full record

ReviewBiological cybernetics2023

Canonical circuit computations for computer vision.

Daniel Schmid, Christian Jarvers, Heiko Neumann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological cybernetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel SchmidInstitute for Neural Information Processing, Ulm University, James-Franck-Ring, Ulm, 89081, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2439-9453
Christian JarversInstitute for Neural Information Processing, Ulm University, James-Franck-Ring, Ulm, 89081, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0062-9776
Heiko NeumannInstitute for Neural Information Processing, Ulm University, James-Franck-Ring, Ulm, 89081, Germany. heiko.neumann@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7687-5792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced computer vision mechanisms have been inspired by neuroscientific findings. However, with the focus on improving benchmark achievements, technical solutions have been shaped by application and engineering constraints. This includes the training of neural networks which led to the development of feature detectors optimally suited to the application domain. However, the limitations of such approaches motivate the need to identify computational principles, or motifs, in biological vision that can enable further foundational advances in machine vision. We propose to utilize structural and functional principles of neural systems that have been largely overlooked. They potentially provide new inspirations for computer vision mechanisms and models. Recurrent feedforward, lateral, and feedback interactions characterize general principles underlying processing in mammals. We derive a formal specification of core computational motifs that utilize these principles. These are combined to define model mechanisms for visual shape and motion processing. We demonstrate how such a framework can be adopted to run on neuromorphic brain-inspired hardware platforms and can be extended to automatically adapt to environment statistics. We argue that the identified principles and their formalization inspires sophisticated computational mechanisms with improved explanatory scope. These and other elaborated, biologically inspired models can be employed to design computer vision solutions for different tasks and they can be used to advance neural network architectures of learning.

Indexed as

ComputersNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBrainLearningMammalsVision, OcularBindingFeedbackNeural networkNeuromorphic computingPerceptual groupingRecurrent processing

Identifiers

PMID37306782
PMCPMC10600314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.