Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306763›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2023

Lymphatic mapping for image-guided radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: a feasibility study.

Judit A Adam, Edwin Poel, Berthe L F van Eck-Smit, Constantijne H Mom, Lukas J A Stalpers, Jaap Stoker, Shandra Bipat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05746156 (Lymphatic Mapping for Image Guided Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer, a Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05746156 nacompletednot on this map

Lymphatic Mapping for Image Guided Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer, a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsLocally Advanced Cervical CancerArmslymphatic mapping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judit A AdamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.a.adam@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-8087
Edwin PoelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0279-5129
Berthe L F van Eck-SmitDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-4332
Constantijne H MomDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-2031
Lukas J A StalpersDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-0295
Jaap StokerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-3784
Shandra BipatDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-2359
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLCentrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). No imaging method can successfully detect all (micro)metastases. This may result in (lymph node) recurrence after chemoradiation. We hypothesized that lymphatic mapping could identify nodes at risk and if radiation treatment volumes are adapted based on the lymphatic map, (micro)metastases not shown on imaging could be treated. We investigated the feasibility of lymphatic mapping to image lymph nodes at risk for (micro)metastases in LACC and assessed the radiotherapy dose on the nodes at risk.

methodsPatients with LACC were included between July 2020 and July 2022. Inclusion criteria were: ≥ 18 years old, intended curative chemoradiotherapy, investigation under anesthesia. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy and extreme obesity. All patients underwent abdominal MRI, [

resultsSeventeen patients participated. In total, 40 nodes at risk were visualized on the lymphatic map in 13/17 patients with a median of two [range 0-7, IQR 0.5-3] nodes per patient, with unilateral drainage in 4/13 and bilateral drainage in 9/13 patients. No complications occurred. The lymphatic map showed more nodes compared to suspicious nodes on MRI or [

conclusionLymphatic mapping is feasible in LACC. Almost 60% of nodes at risk received suboptimal treatment during chemoradiation. As treatment failure could be caused by (micro)metastasis in some of these nodes, including nodes at risk in the radiotherapy treatment volume could improve radiotherapy treatment outcome in LACC. Trail registration The study was first registered at the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) under number of NL9323 on 4 March 2021. Considering the source platform was not operational anymore, the study was retrospectively registered again on February 27, 2023 at CilicalTrials.gov under number of NCT05746156.

Indexed as

[99mTc]Tc-nanocolloidLocally advanced cervical cancerLymphatic mappingRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37306763
PMCPMC10260720
OpenAlexW4380291941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.