Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306492›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2023

Early or late initiation of dabigatran versus vitamin-K-antagonists in acute ischemic stroke or TIA: The PRODAST study.

Gerrit M Grosse, Anika Hüsing, Andreas Stang, Nils Kuklik, Marcus Brinkmann, Darius Nabavi, Paul Sparenberg, Karin Weissenborn, Klaus Gröschel, Georg Royl and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. [What is confirmed in the treatment of ischemic stroke].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerrit M GrosseDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5335-9880
Anika HüsingDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Andreas StangDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Nils KuklikDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marcus BrinkmannDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Darius NabaviDepartment of Neurology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Paul SparenbergDepartment of Neurology, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Karin WeissenbornDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-8938
Klaus GröschelDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0244-6116
Georg RoylDepartment of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Sven PoliDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0286-8781
Dominik MichalskiDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph C EschenfelderHuman Pharma Germany, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2766-2488
Christian WeimarDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph DienerDepartment of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-8612
PRODAST Investigators
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEBDH-Klinik Elzach · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoston University · USEssen University Hospital · DEHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELeipzig University · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal timing of initiating or resuming anticoagulation after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is debated. Dabigatran, a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC), has shown superiority against vitamin K antagonists (VKA) regarding hemorrhagic complications.

aimsIn this registry study, we investigated the initiation of dabigatran in the early phase after AIS or TIA.

methodsPRODAST (Prospective Record of the Use of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Stroke or TIA) is a prospective, multicenter, observational, post-authorization safety study. We recruited 10,039 patients at 86 German stroke units between July 2015 and November 2020. A total of 3,312 patients were treated with dabigatran or VKA and were eligible for the analysis that investigates risks for major hemorrhagic events within 3 months after early (⩽ 7 days) or late (> 7 days) initiation of dabigatran or VKA initiated at any time. Further endpoints were recurrent stroke, ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, death, and a composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, life-threatening bleeding and death.

resultsMajor bleeding event rates per 10,000 treatment days ranged from 1.9 for late administered dabigatran to 4.9 for VKA. Early or late initiation of dabigatran was associated with a lower hazard for major hemorrhages as compared to VKA use. The difference was pronounced for intracranial hemorrhages with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-2.21) for early dabigatran use versus VKA use and an adjusted HR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-13.11) for late dabigatran use versus VKA use. No differences were found between early initiation of dabigatran versus VKA use regarding ischemic endpoints.

conclusionsThe early application of dabigatran appears to be safer than VKA administered at any time point with regards to the risk of hemorrhagic complications and in particular for intracranial hemorrhage. This result, however, must be interpreted with caution in view of the low precision of the estimate.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationEmbolismIschemic Attack, TransientIschemic StrokeStrokeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsDabigatranHemorrhageHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesProspective StudiesVitaminsAnticoagulantsDabigatranVitaminsAcute ischemic strokeanticoagulationdabigatranhemorrhagic transformationintracranial hemorrhagesecondary preventiontransient ischemic attackvitamin K antagonists

Identifiers

PMID37306492
PMCPMC10676026
OpenAlexW4380290785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.