Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306401›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2023

Updates on Recent Clinical Assessment of Commercial Chronic Wound Care Products.

Archita Sharma, Dhavan Sharma, Feng Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Hydrogel-Based Skin Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Application of pulsed electric field technology to skin engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Archita SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77840, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-4181
Dhavan SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77840, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5816-7522
Feng ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77840, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-9027
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Engineered Anisotropic and Vascularized Human Cardiac PatchR01HL146652 · NHLBI · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI ZHAO, FENG · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
Therapeutic Lymphatic Vessel RegenerationR15CA202656 · NCI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, FENG · 2016 to 2016
$465k
Development of Off-the-shelf Completely Biological Small-Diameter Blood Vessel wiR15HL115521 · NHLBI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, FENG · 2013 to 2013
$410k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA202656NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146652NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL115521NIH HHS R01HL146652NIH HHS R15CA202656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired wound healing after trauma, disorders, and surgeries impact millions of people globally every year. Dysregulation in orchestrated healing mechanisms and underlying medical complications make chronic wound management extremely challenging. Besides standard-of-care treatments including broad spectrum antibiotics and wound-debridement, novel adjuvant therapies are clinically tested and commercialized. These include topical agents, skin substitutes, growth factor delivery, and stem cell therapies. With a goal to overcome factors playing pivotal role in delayed wound healing, researchers are exploring novel approaches to elicit desirable healing outcomes in chronic wounds. Although recent innovations in wound care products, therapies, and devices are extensively reviewed in past, a comprehensive review summarizing their clinical outcomes is surprisingly lacking. Herein, this work reviews the commercially available wound care products and their performance in clinical trials to provide a statistically comprehensive understanding of their safety and efficacy. The performance and suitability of various commercial wound care platforms, including xenogeneic and allogenic products, wound care devices, and novel biomaterials, are discussed for chronic wounds. The current clinical evaluation will provide a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of the most-recent approaches and will enable researchers and healthcare providers to develop next-generation technologies for chronic wound management.

Indexed as

Skin, ArtificialWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterialschronic woundsgrowth factorsskin woundstissue engineeringwound carewound healing

Identifiers

PMID37306401
PMCPMC11932735
OpenAlexW4380290425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.