Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306328›Full record

SynthesisNursing open2023

Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews.

Marja Hult, Anja Terkamo-Moisio, Pirjo Kaakinen, Suyen Karki, Anu Nurmeksela, Mira Palonen, Laura-Maria Peltonen, Arja Häggman-Laitila

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marja HultDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-5914
Anja Terkamo-MoisioDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1483-1238
Pirjo KaakinenResearch unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Suyen KarkiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Anu NurmekselaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mira PalonenDepartment of Nursing Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Laura-Maria PeltonenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Arja Häggman-LaitilaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess and describe reviews of nursing leadership styles associated with organizational, staff and patient outcomes.

designA systematic review of reviews.

methodsReviews describing a search strategy and quality assessment. The review followed the PRISMA statement. Nine databases were searched in February 2022.

resultsAfter screening 6992 records, 12 reviews were included reporting 85 outcomes for 17 relational, nine task-oriented, five passive and five destructive leadership styles. Transformational leadership, which is one of the relational styles, was the most studied among all the styles. Of the outcomes, staff outcomes were the most reported, notably job satisfaction, and patient outcomes were less reported. Also, mediating factors between relational leadership styles and staff and patient outcomes were identified.

conclusionExtensive research shows the beneficial impacts of relational leadership; however, destructive leadership research is lacking. Relational leadership styles should be conceptually assessed. More research is needed on how nurse leadership affects patients and organizations.

Indexed as

LeadershipNurse AdministratorsHumansInterprofessional RelationsJob SatisfactionWorkplacenurse outcomesnurse-sensitive outcomesnursing management and leadershipnursing stafforganizational outcomespatient outcomessystematic reviewumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID37306328
PMCPMC10415995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.