Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37306178›Full record

SynthesisNursing open2023

Family centered nursing practices towards women and their families in the birthing context: A qualitative systematic review.

Isabelle Landry, Caroline René, Francine Demontigny

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabelle LandryCentre for Studies and Research on Family Intervention (CERIF), Department of Nursing Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-904X
Caroline RenéCentre for Studies and Research on Family Intervention (CERIF), Department of Nursing Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-6444
Francine DemontignyCentre for Studies and Research on Family Intervention (CERIF), Research Group on Fatherhood, Family and Society, Department of Nursing Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSynthesize qualitative evidence examining how nurses' attitudes, beliefs, and sense of efficacy and the context surrounding birth facilitate or hinder family-centered nursing practice.

designThematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

methodsA literature search was conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, SCIENCE DIRECT, REPÈRES, CAIRN, and ÉRUDIT from October 2020 to June 2021. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, and studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, and Thomas and Harden's qualitative thematic synthesis method was performed for data analysis.

resultsThirteen studies were included. Three analytical themes were generated: (1) sharing power: opposing beliefs, (2) feeling a sense of efficacy in fulfilling one's role, and (3) managing a challenging work environment. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Synthesizing nurses' experience is essential to promote implementation of favourable changes for care that is more focused on the needs of families.

Indexed as

Family NursingNursesFemaleHumansPatientsQualitative Researchattitude of health personnelfamily practicelabournurse-patient relationsnursesobstetricspowerqualitative systematic reviewself-efficacyworkplace

Identifiers

PMID37306178
PMCPMC10416028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.