Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305851›Full record

ArticleSleep medicine: X2023

Screen use and sleep duration and quality at 15 years old: Cohort study.

Priscila Echevarria, Bianca Del-Ponte, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Alicia Matijasevich, Camila S Halal, Iná S Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Priscila EchevarriaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Bianca Del-PontePrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Luciana Tovo-RodriguesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Alicia MatijasevichDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Camila S HalalFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Iná S SantosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective/background: The evidence on the association between screen use and sleep of adolescents is mainly based on studies about time watching television, with a few examining time using computers, videogames, and mobile devices. Our aim was to investigate the association between screen time for entertainment (watching TV, using computer, or playing games on tablets, smartphones, or videogame consoles) and sleep duration and self-reported sleep quality, among adolescents aged 15 years. Methods: With data from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort, sleep duration was assessed with questions extracted from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and quality was self-reported. Adjusted β coefficients and prevalence ratios (PR) with (95% confidence intervals) were obtained, respectively, by linear and Poisson regressions. Results: 1,949 adolescents had information about screen time and sleep quality, and 1,851 about screen time and sleep duration. The median screen time was 4.5hs/24hs. The mean sleep duration was 7.6hs/24hs and the prevalence of bad sleep was 17.3% (15.7-19.0%). There was an inverse relationship between screen time and sleep duration. When compared with those with less than 2hs/24hs of screen time, adolescents with 6-8.8hs/24hs and ≥9hs experienced, respectively, 23.4 and 32.4 min reduction in sleep duration (β = -0.39; -0.62;-0.16 and β = -0.54; -0.77;-0.30). Adolescents with ≥9hs of screen time were 60% more likely to report bad sleep than those with less than 2hs/24hs (PR: 1.60; 1.10-2.32). Conclusions: The median time spent using screens was longer than recommended. Screen use for ≥6hs/24hs was associated with a shorter sleep duration, and ≥9hs/24hs with poor sleep quality.

Indexed as

AdolescentsCohort studyScreenSleepSleep durationSleep quality

Identifiers

PMID37305851
PMCPMC10251069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.