ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Deep Learning-Based Robust Automated System for Predicting Human Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sperm DNA fragmentation and its impact on pregnancy outcomes: a narrative review focusing on threshold definition and clinical strategies.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- FERTILITY CARE IN LOW- AND MIDDLE- INCOME COUNTRIES: The future use of AI to improve accessibility of assisted reproductive technology in low- and middle-income countries.Reproduction & fertility · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Andrology: A New Frontier in Male Infertility Diagnosis and Treatment.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Biomarker-based human and animal sperm phenotyping: the good, the bad and the ugly†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Determining the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) by the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test involves manual counting of stained sperms with halo and no halo. Aims: The aim of this study is to build a robust artificial intelligence-based solution to predict the DFI. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective experimental study conducted in a secondary Materials and Methods: We obtained 24,415 images from 30 patients after the SCD test using a phase-contrast microscope. We classified the dataset into two, binary (halo/no halo) and multiclass (big/medium/small halo/degraded (DEG)/dust). Our approach consists of a training and prediction phase. The 30 patients' images were divided into training (24) and prediction (6) sets. A pre-processing method Statistical Analysis Used: To interpret the findings, the precision-recall curve and F1 score were utilised. Results: Binary and multiclass datasets containing 8887 and 15,528 cropped sperm image regions showed an accuracy of 80.15% versus 75.25%. A precision-recall curve was determined and the binary and multiclass datasets obtained an F1 score of 0.81 versus 0.72. A confusion matrix was applied for predicted and actuals for the multiclass approach where small halo and medium halo confusion were found to be highest. Conclusion: Our proposed machine learning model can standardise and aid in arriving at accurate results without using expensive software. It provides accurate information about healthy and DEG sperms in a given sample, thereby attaining better clinical outcomes. The binary approach performed better with our model than the multiclass approach. However, the multiclass approach can highlight the distribution of fragmented and non-fragmented sperms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.