Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305756›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Accounting for uncertainty in training data to improve machine learning performance in predicting new disease activity in early multiple sclerosis.

Maryam Tayyab, Luanne M Metz, David K B Li, Shannon Kolind, Robert Carruthers, Anthony Traboulsee, Roger C Tam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Semi-Supervised Learning for Predicting Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam TayyabSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Luanne M MetzCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
David K B LiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shannon KolindDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Robert CarruthersDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Anthony TraboulseeDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Roger C TamSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Machine learning (ML) has great potential for using health data to predict clinical outcomes in individual patients. Missing data are a common challenge in training ML algorithms, such as when subjects withdraw from a clinical study, leaving some samples with missing outcome labels. In this study, we have compared three ML models to determine whether accounting for label uncertainty can improve a model's predictions. Methods: We used a dataset from a completed phase-III clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy of minocycline for delaying the conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis (MS), using the McDonald 2005 diagnostic criteria. There were a total of 142 participants, and at the 2-year follow-up 81 had converted to MS, 29 remained stable, and 32 had uncertain outcomes. In a stratified 7-fold cross-validation, we trained three random forest (RF) ML models using MRI volumetric features and clinical variables to predict the conversion outcome, which represented new disease activity within 2 years of a first clinical demyelinating event. One RF was trained using subjects with the uncertain labels excluded (RF Results: Probabilistic random forest outperformed both the RF models with the highest AUC (0.76, compared to 0.69 for RF Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms capable of modeling label uncertainty can improve predictive performance in datasets in which a substantial number of subjects have unknown outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical predictionlabel uncertaintymachine learningmissing labelsMRImultiple sclerosisnoisy labels

Identifiers

PMID37305756
PMCPMC10251494
OpenAlexW4378470023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.