Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Dynamic monitoring of service members to quantify blast exposure levels during combat training using BlackBox Biometrics Blast Gauges: explosive breaching, shoulder-fired weapons, artillery, mortars, and 0.50 caliber guns.

Suthee Wiri, Todd Massow, James Reid, Joshua Whitty, Cyrus Dunbar, Wallace Graves, Andrea Gonzales, David Ortley, Jasmyne Longwell, Charles E Needham and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Suthee WiriApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Todd MassowNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
James ReidNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Joshua WhittyNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Cyrus DunbarNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Wallace GravesNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Andrea GonzalesApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
David OrtleyApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Jasmyne LongwellApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Charles E NeedhamNeedham Consulting, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Alex ZiegleApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Virginia PhanApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Fabio LeonessaNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Josh L DuckworthNeurology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONQUER is a pilot blast monitoring program that monitors, quantifies, and reports to military units the training-related blast overpressure exposure of their service members. Overpressure exposure data are collected using the BlackBox Biometrics (B3) Blast Gauge System (BGS, generation 7) sensors mounted on the body during training. To date, the CONQUER program has recorded 450,000 gauge triggers on monitored service members. The subset of data presented here has been collected from 202 service members undergoing training with explosive breaching charges, shoulder-fired weapons, artillery, mortars, and 0.50 caliber guns. Over 12,000 waveforms were recorded by the sensors worn by these subjects. A maximum peak overpressure of 90.3 kPa (13.1 psi) was recorded during shoulder-fired weapon training. The largest overpressure impulse (a measure of blast energy) was 82.0 kPa-ms (11.9 psi-ms) and it was recorded during explosive breaching with a large wall charge. Operators of 0.50 caliber machine guns have the lowest peak overpressure impulse (as low as 0.62 kPa-ms or 0.09 psi-ms) of the blast sources considered. The data provides information on the accumulation of blast overpressure on service members over an extended period of time. The cumulative peak overpressure, peak overpressure impulse, or timing between exposures is all available in the exposure data.

Indexed as

blast overpressureblast sensorbody mountedmilitary trainingoperational monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37305738
PMCPMC10248048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.