Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305724›Full record

ReviewTranslational pediatrics2023

Challenges in the clinical understanding of genetic testing in birth defects and pediatric diseases.

Tina O Findley, Jacqueline G Parchem, Aarti Ramdaney, Sarah U Morton

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tina O FindleyDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jacqueline G ParchemDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Aarti RamdaneyDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sarah U MortonDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Memorial Hermann · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in prenatal/neonatal genetic screening practices and next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have made the detection of molecular causes of pediatric diseases increasingly more affordable, accessible, and rapid in return of results. In the past, families searching for answers often required diagnostic journeys leading to delays in targeted care and missed diagnoses. Non-invasive prenatal NGS is now used routinely in pregnancy, significantly altering the obstetric approach to early screening and evaluation of fetal anomalies. Similarly, exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) were once only available for research but are now used in patient care, impacting neonatal care and the field of neonatology as a whole. In this review we will summarize the growing body of literature on the role of ES/GS in prenatal/neonatal care, specifically in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), and the molecular diagnostic yield. Furthermore, we will discuss the impact of advances in genetic testing in prenatal/neonatal care and discuss challenges faced by clinicians and families. Clinical application of NGS has come with many challenges in counseling families on interpretation of diagnostic results and incidental findings, as well as re-interpretation of prior genetic test results. How genetic results may influence medical decision-making is highly nuanced and needs further study. The ethics of parental consent and disclosure of genetic conditions with limited therapeutic options continue to be debated in the medical genetics community. While these questions remain unanswered, the benefits of a standardized approach to genetic testing in the NICU will be highlighted by two case vignettes.

Indexed as

Congenital disordergenetic testingneonatal intensive care unit (NICU)non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)prenatal counseling

Identifiers

PMID37305724
PMCPMC10248941
OpenAlexW4375826723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.