ArticleAPL bioengineering2023
AI-aided holographic flow cytometry for label-free identification of ovarian cancer cells in the presence of unbalanced datasets.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label-free detection of ovarian cancer cells in ascites-related cell models using digital holographic flow cytometry.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Current Biomarkers, Emerging Technologies, and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Lightweight CNN efficiently discriminates ovarian cancer cells from a tumor microenvironment via holographic imaging flow cytometry.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Label-free imaging flow cytometry for cell classification based directly on multiple off-axis holographic projections.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Rapid flowing cells localization enabled by spatiotemporal manipulation of their holographic patterns.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is a valuable emerging alternative to tissue biopsy with great potential in the noninvasive early diagnostics of cancer. Liquid biopsy based on single cell analysis can be a powerful approach to identify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the bloodstream and could provide new opportunities to be implemented in routine screening programs. Since CTCs are very rare, the accurate classification based on high-throughput and highly informative microscopy methods should minimize the false negative rates. Here, we show that holographic flow cytometry is a valuable instrument to obtain quantitative phase-contrast maps as input data for artificial intelligence (AI)-based classifiers. We tackle the problem of discriminating between A2780 ovarian cancer cells and THP1 monocyte cells based on the phase-contrast images obtained in flow cytometry mode. We compare conventional machine learning analysis and deep learning architectures in the non-ideal case of having a dataset with unbalanced populations for the AI training step. The results show the capacity of AI-aided holographic flow cytometry to discriminate between the two cell lines and highlight the important role played by the phase-contrast signature of the cells to guarantee accurate classification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.