ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Laparoscopic bilateral ileal ureter replacement for bilateral long-segment ureteral strictures: a case series of nine patients.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ileal ureteral replacement for tuberculous ureteral strictures: 11 cases of experience.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Minimal-invasive ileal ureter replacement for the management of multiple ureteral polyps: the initial experience.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Advancements in minimally invasive bilateral ileal ureter replacement: a promising approach for complex long-segment ureteric strictures.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment of bilateral long segment ureteral strictures is challenging. Minimally invasive bilateral ileal ureter replacement has been presented with limited experience. This study presents the results of the largest known sample size of minimally invasive bilateral ileal ureter replacement as well as the very first experience of minimally invasive bilateral ileal ureter replacement. Case Description: From April 2021 to October 2022, nine cases of laparoscopic bilateral ileal ureter replacement for bilateral long-segment ureteral strictures were recruited from the database of RECUTTER. Patient characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were gathered retrospectively. Success was defined as relieved hydronephrosis and a stable renal function without serious complications. All the nine patients underwent the procedure successfully without serious complications or conversion. The median stricture length of bilateral ureters was 15 cm (range, 8-20). The median length of the ileum used was 25 cm (range, 25-30). The median operative time was 360 minutes (range, 270-400). The median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range, 50-300). The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (range, 9-25). At a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 6-17), all patients maintained stable renal function and showed improvement in hydronephrosis. Four postoperative complications were recorded, including three urinary tract infections and one incomplete bowel obstruction. No serious postoperative complications occurred. Conclusions: Laparoscopic bilateral ileal ureter replacement is safe and feasible for bilateral long-segment ureteral strictures. However, a large sample size with long-term follow-up is still needed to further demonstrate it as the preferred option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.